Hej og tak for dit svar,
Jeg var nødt til omhyggeligt at gennemgå min transaktionshistorik og e-mail-optegnelser for at få en klar forståelse af tidslinjen, da det forståeligt nok er vanskeligt at huske alle detaljer præcist efter så lang en forsinkelse. Som du ved, forsinkede casinoet denne proces i flere måneder, før de endelig informerede mig om deres beslutning.
Det viser sig, at jeg i starten huskede en del af situationen forkert. Jeg havde faktisk allerede spillet velkomstbonussen et par uger forinden. Derefter sendte casinoet mig adskillige reload-bonustilbud via e-mail, som var endnu mere attraktive. Det er disse bonusser, som jeg til sidst vandt på.
Først havde jeg én gevinst, og bagefter sendte de endnu et bonustilbud via e-mail. Dette nye tilbud blev ikke blokeret på nogen måde af den eksisterende, ventende udbetaling. Jeg kan ikke sige dette med absolut sikkerhed, men jeg kan endda have kontaktet livechatten for at bekræfte, at det var tilladt at spille en anden bonus, mens der var en ventende udbetaling, bare for at sikre, at jeg ikke overtrådte nogen regler. Jeg kan dog ikke hævde dette som en kendsgerning, da jeg ikke helt kan huske det. Casinoet burde have adgang til chatloggene, hvis de er villige til at gennemgå dem.
Det vigtige er, at det var to separate bonusser. Cashback'en blev også krediteret separat, og jeg modtog endda en e-mail, der bekræftede det. Jeg vandt også fra cashback'en, men den blev også konfiskeret. Jeg besluttede mig for ikke at inkludere den her for at holde fokus på sagen.
Med hensyn til de spil, jeg spillede, spillede jeg i disse bonusperioder primært et spil kaldet 9K Yeti, som jeg nyder. I tidligere spil havde jeg også spillet Wild Chapo (selvom jeg ikke tror, det var under omsætningen af disse specifikke bonusser). Jeg loggede ind på min konto for at bekræfte de spillede spil. Ingen af disse spil er forbudte i henhold til de nuværende bonusvilkår, og de var heller ikke opført som begrænsede spil på det tidspunkt.
Dette rejser et vigtigt spørgsmål: forventes det nu, at en spiller skal skifte spil gentagne gange under bonusomsætning for at undgå, at casinoet hævder, at konsekvent spil er en "taktik"? Og hvis en spiller skifter spil, kan det så også betegnes som en taktik? Denne fortolkning er urimelig og understøttes ikke af nogen klart skrevne bonusvilkår.
Casinoet fortsætter med at sende mig marketingmails næsten ugentligt. Faktisk modtog jeg i går et bonustilbud på 200% via e-mail. Jeg mener ikke, det er fair praksis for et casino aggressivt at promovere bonusser og opfordre til indbetalinger, kun for at konfiskere gevinster senere baseret på vage eller løst fortolkede regler - især når ingen af de klart skrevne bonusvilkår er blevet overtrådt.
Det er også værd at bemærke, at hvis jeg havde tabt, er jeg sikker på, at casinoet ikke ville have refunderet mine tab. Dette skaber en situation, hvor casinoet reelt udvælger og vælger resultater, der gavner dem. Jeg mener, at andre spillere i det mindste bør gøres opmærksomme på denne adfærd for at undgå at støde på lignende problemer med denne operatør.
Jeg har sendt dig e-mails med de tilbud, der er nævnt i beskeden, samt en trykt kopi af bonusvilkårene og skærmbilleder fra spillehistorikken på casinoet.
Hello and thank you for your response,
I had to carefully review my transaction history and email records to get a clear understanding of the timeline, as it is understandably difficult to recall all details accurately after such a long delay. As you know, the casino delayed this process for months before ultimately informing me of their decision.
It turns out I initially remembered part of the situation incorrectly. I had indeed already played the welcome bonus a few weeks prior. After that, the casino sent me several reload bonus offers via email, which were even more attractive. These are the bonuses from which I eventually won.
I first had one win, and afterward they sent another bonus offer via email. This new offer was not blocked in any way by the existing pending withdrawal. I cannot state this with absolute certainty, but I may even have contacted live chat to confirm that it was allowed to play another bonus while having a pending withdrawal, just to ensure I was not violating any rules. However, I cannot claim this as a fact since I do not fully remember. The casino should have access to the chat logs if they are willing to review them.
The important point is that these were two separate bonuses. The cashback was also credited separately, and I even received an email confirming it. I did win from the cashback as well, but that was also confiscated. I decided not to include it here to keep the matter focused.
Regarding the games played, during these bonus periods I mainly played a game called 9K Yeti, which I enjoy. In earlier gameplay I had also played Wild Chapo (although I do not believe it was during the wagering of these specific bonuses). I logged into my account to verify the games played. Neither of these games are prohibited under the current bonus terms, and they were not listed as restricted games at the time either.
This raises an important question: is it now expected that a player must change games repeatedly during bonus wagering to avoid the casino claiming that consistent gameplay is a "tactic"? And if a player does change games, could that then also be labeled a tactic? This interpretation is unreasonable and not supported by any clearly written bonus terms.
The casino continues to send me marketing emails on an almost weekly basis. In fact, just yesterday I received a 200% bonus offer via email. I do not believe it is fair practice for a casino to aggressively promote bonuses and encourage deposits, only to confiscate winnings later based on vague or loosely interpreted rules — especially when none of the clearly written bonus terms have been breached.
It is also worth noting that if I had lost, I am confident the casino would not have refunded my losses. This creates a situation where the casino effectively picks and chooses outcomes that benefit them. I believe other players should at least be made aware of this behavior to avoid encountering similar issues with this operator.
I sent you via email the emails of the offers mentioned in the message as well as the printed copy of the Bonus Terms and screenshots from the gaming history at the casino.
Automatisk oversættelse: