Hej Elody.
Jeg vil sige, at casinoet har ret, når de siger, at det er dig, der bestemmer, om du vil tage imod bonussen.
I et par øjeblikke var jeg overbevist om, at du sagde, at du havde fået bonussen automatisk, men dit svar misser igen det punkt fuldstændigt.
Så jeg holder mig til den seneste opdatering.
Hvis du kendte vilkårene, vil jeg vædde på, at du ikke vil blive så overrasket over, at der faktisk er et win-cap.
Så vi kommer tilbage til begyndelsen, hvor du højst sandsynligt begik fejlen ved at antage, at bonussen automatisk skal have en fordel for spilleren. I disse dage er det dog noget af en snak at finde en anstændig bonus.
Tag det fra den modsatte side af visningen: Giver det mening for et kasino at tilbyde noget gratis eller oven på dit indskud med mulighed for at ramme noget stort? Nej, det er derfor, næsten alle bonusser kommer med et omsætningskrav og det maksimale udbetalingsbeløb.
Da du ikke kendte det grundlæggende, besluttede du at spille jackpotspillet. Ville du være lige så bekymret for kasinoregler senere, hvis du vidste, at brug af bonussen ikke ville give dig jackpotten?
Jeg ved, det er en deprimerende oplevelse. Dine heldige spins er dog næppe casinoets skyld, så længe du havde friheden til at vælge, om du ville have den bonus eller ej.
Efter min mening ville vi nok ikke have denne diskussion, hvis du havde læst vilkårene.
"Ydermere er bonusvilkårene, som gav en 40-dobbelt omsætning og kun en maksimal udbetaling på 50 euro, ulogiske og ufordelagtige for loyale kunder."
Hvorfor tog du så bonussen?
Du ved, at det er en meget farlig idé at forvente, at alle bonusser på tværs af casinoerne er ens, og du stod over for konsekvenserne. I stedet for at antage ting, så læs vilkårene, og hvis du mener, at noget ikke passer til din spillestil eller simpelthen er alt for ufordelagtigt, så lad være med at tage det.
"For et par år siden var der ingen maksimal udbetalingsgrænse. Bonuspengene skulle kun omsættes 40 gange. I øjeblikket er ingen bonus værd at bruge."
Jeg er ked af det, men det er stadig den samme situation. alle dine indvendinger ville have ringe betydning, hvis du blot læste vilkårene, før du accepterer bonussen 🙁 Sammenligning af historien med nutidens bonusser vil også kun føre dig til problemer. Jeg håber, at alt er mere indlysende nu.
For at opsummere det lidt:
før du accepterer et tilbud, skal du altid finde dets vilkår
Spørg supporten eller chat, hvis vilkårene er uklare
hvis betingelserne er alt for restriktive, skal du ikke acceptere tilbuddet
Når du holder dig til disse ligetil trin, har du en stor chance for ikke at blive skuffet igen.
Så tog du gerne bonussen, eller blev den automatisk tildelt dig, tak? Hvis du ikke har noget imod det, vil jeg gerne være sikker på det.
Hello, Elody.
I'd say the casino is quite right when they say it is you who decide whether you want to take the bonus.
For a few moments, I was convinced that you said you had been given the bonus automatically, yet your reply again misses that point completely.
So, I'll stick with the latest update.
If you knew the terms, I bet you won't be so surprised there is actually a win-cap.
So, we're getting back to the beginning, when you most likely made the mistake by assumming the bonus must automatically hold an advantage for the player. These days, however, finding a decent bonus is quite a chatch.
Take it from the opposite site of the view: Does it make sense for a casino to offer something free or atop your deposit with the possibility of hitting something grand? No, this is why almost every bonus comes with a wagering requirement and maximum withdrawable amount.
Since you did not know the fundamentals, you decided to play the jackpot game. Would you be as worried about casino regulations later on if you knew that using the bonus would not earn you the jackpot?
I know it is a depressing experience. However, your lucky spins are hardly the casino's fault as long as you had the freedom to choose whether or not you wanted that bonus.
In my opinion, we probably would not be having this discussion if you had read the terms.
"Furthermore, the bonus terms, which provided for a 40-fold turnover and only a maximum payout of 50 euros, are illogical and disadvantageous to loyal customers. "
Why did you take the bonus then?
You know, expecting all bonuses across the casinos to be the same is a very dangerous idea, and you faced the consequences. Instead of assuming things, read the terms, and if you think something does not suit your playstyle or is simply far to disadvantageous, do not take it.
"A few years ago there was no max withdrawal limit. The bonus money only had to be wagered 40 times. Currently, no bonus is worth using."
I'm sorry, but this is still the same situation. all your objections would have little meaning if you simply read the terms before accepting the bonus 🙁 Comparing history to nowadays bonuses will also only lead you to troubles. I hope all is now more obvious.
To summarize it a bit:
before you accept an offer, always find its terms
if the terms are unclear, ask the support or chat
if the conditions are far too restrictive, don't accept the offer
When you stick with these straightforward steps, you have a strong chance not to be disappointed again.
So, did you take the bonus willingly, or was it automatically awarded to you, please? If you don't mind, I would like to be certain about that.
Automatisk oversættelse:
