Jeg kan se, hvordan du forsøger at retfærdiggøre dig selv og dette firma. Bare fordi du laver disse "sikkerhedsindekser" baseret på forskellige metrics, som du opgør, betyder det ikke, at casinoet er legitimt. En af dine metrics er baseret på spilleranmeldelser, mindst halvdelen af anmeldelserne er negative, men du har stadig en høj vurdering. Kasinoet er relativt nyt og ikke etableret, men stadig en høj vurdering. Ejeren har eksisteret længere, men har også en masse dårlige anmeldelser, men stadig en høj vurdering.
Du kan fortsætte med at prøve at fortælle andre, og måske dig selv, at du ikke gør noget forkert ved at promovere en lyssky side som Drip Casino. Og fortsæt med at sige "enhver spiller har mulighed for ikke at spille i kasinoet. Ingen er tvunget til at indbetale penge." Hjælper det dig med at retfærdiggøre det, du gør?
Hvis en bank blev skudt op af røvere, og nogen var ved at gå ind, ville du fortælle dem, at de ikke skulle gå ind, eller ville du åbne døren for dem i håb om, at røverne ville give dig en kommission?
Du er lige så skyldig som disse websteder, og ja, hvad du gør er ikke ulovligt, men det er bestemt ikke den rigtige ting at gøre. Folk er afhængige af anmeldelseswebsteder for at prøve at luge ud i de mange lyssky websteder som Drip, og når disse anmeldelsessider er i forhold og får betalt provision fra disse websteder, går integriteten tabt.
Hvis du rent faktisk tjener penge på tab af spillere, som du sagde, at du gør, gætter jeg på, at det ville være i din bedste interesse at sende spillere til et websted, hvor tabene ville forekomme hyppigere end måske et mere legitimt websted. Hmm.
Intet kommer til at ændre sig med dette svar, jeg skriver, men forhåbentlig ser du, og måske et par andre mennesker kan se, at det du gør er forkert, uanset hvordan du prøver at dreje det.
I see how you are trying to justify yourself and this company. Just because you make up these "safety indexes" based on different metrics that you make up doesn't mean that the casino is legitimate. One of your metrics is based on player reviews, at least half of the reviews are negative, yet you still have a high rating. The casino is relatively new and not established, yet still a high rating. The owner has been around longer, but also have a lot of poor reviews, yet still a high rating.
You can continue to try and tell others, and maybe yourself, that you are doing nothing wrong by promoting a shady site like Drip Casino. And continue to say "every player has the option not to play in the casino. No one is forced to deposit money." Does that help you justify what you are doing?
If a bank was being shot up by robbers and someone was about to walk in would you tell them not to go in or would you open the door for them in hope the robbers would give you a commission?
You are just as culpable as these sites and yes what you are doing is not illegal but it surely isn't the right thing to do. People rely on review sites to try and weed out the many shady sites like Drip, and when these review sites are in relationships and getting paid commissions from these sites the the integrity is lost.
If you do in fact make money on player losses, like you said you do, I guess it would be in your best interest to funnel players to a site where the losses would occur more frequently than maybe a more legitimate site. Hmm.
Nothing is going to change with this reply I am writing but hopefully you see and maybe a couple of other people see what you are doing is wrong, no matter how you try and spin it.
Automatisk oversættelse: