Jeg har selv set, hvordan denne hjemmeside fungerer. For måneder siden indgav jeg en officiel klage, fordi jeg blev behandlet uretfærdigt. Efter et stykke tid blev min klage fjernet uden nogen forklaring. Mit tab forblev uløst, og problemet blev simpelthen begravet og glemt.
For et par dage siden dukkede emnet op igen. Kort efter skete der noget meget afslørende. Mest sandsynligt for at skubbe min negative kommentar ned og ud af syne, kontaktede siden folk, der havde lavet shoots – eller endda dem, der havde oplevet problemer under shoots – og tilbød dem belønninger til gengæld for at skrive positive kommentarer under en bestemt tråd. Den pludselige bølge af "gode" anmeldelser her er ikke tilfældig. Dette er en almindelig taktik. Jeg har personligt modtaget et lignende tilbud fra en anden platform før, så jeg ved præcis, hvordan det fungerer.
Hr. Jaro, jeg mener, det nu burde stå klart, at min holdning er berettiget. Hjemmesiden forårsagede ikke kun mit økonomiske tab og beholdt mine penge, men forsøgte også at dække over det.
Min forventning var enkel: De burde have rettet deres fejl på det tidspunkt og løst problemet korrekt. Selv hvis det var blevet forsinket, kunne de have kontaktet mig, informeret mig om, at problemet var løst, og bedt mig om at offentliggøre dette. Sådan er professionalisme. I stedet skete der intet af det.
Dette er virkeligheden, hvad jeg oplevede. Enhver kan drage sine egne konklusioner.
I have seen firsthand how this site operates. Months ago, I filed an official complaint because I was treated unfairly. After some time, my complaint was removed without any explanation. My loss remained unresolved, and the issue was simply buried and forgotten.
A few days ago, the topic resurfaced. Soon after, something very telling happened. Most likely to push my negative comment down and out of sight, the site contacted people who had done shoots — or even those who had experienced issues during shoots — and offered them rewards in exchange for posting positive comments under a specific thread. The sudden wave of "good" reviews here is not a coincidence. This is a common tactic. I have personally received a similar offer from another platform before, so I know exactly how this works.
Mr. Jaro, I believe it should now be clear that my position is justified. The site not only caused my financial loss and kept my money, but also attempted to cover it up.
My expectation was simple: they should have corrected their mistake at the time and resolved the issue properly. Even if delayed, they could have contacted me, informed me that the problem was fixed, and asked me to state this publicly. That is what professionalism looks like. Instead, none of that happened.
This is the reality of what I experienced. Everyone can draw their own conclusions.
Automatisk oversættelse:
