Jeg vil gerne spørge dig, hvad det her handler om, hvis du ikke har noget imod det.
Jeg fandt kun én lukket klage, du har sendt mod iWild Casino . Ja, det blev afvist, men på grund af manglende beviser leveret af dig i første omgang.
Citerer:
"Spilleren fra Østrig anmodede om selvudelukkelse på grund af ludomani, men han var i stand til at genåbne sin konto kort efter. Spilleren fremlagde ikke bevis for, at han anmodede om selvudelukkelse, derfor var vi tvunget til at afvise denne klage."
Tja, hvorfor skulle vi kontakte kasinoet, hvis vores hænder bogstaveligt talt er tomme? Jeg mener, hvad skal vi kræve af caisno for at sikre dit krav?
Det er faktisk ikke korrekt at sige, at vi ikke kontakter kasinoerne, fordi vi er ligeglade med lovene. På den anden side har mange spillere fra forskellige lande stadig en tendens til at spille på "ulovlige" casinoer – som du siger. Derfor sigter vi efter at levere casinoanmeldelser for alle tilgængelige casinoer. Vi giver information, forveksle det ikke med kampagner, tak.
I'd like to ask you what this is about if you don't mind.
I only found one closed complaint you posted against iWild Casino. Yes, it was rejected, but due to a lack of evidence provided by you in the first place.
Quoting:
"The player from Austria requested self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, however, he was able to reopen his account soon after. The player didn't provide proof that he requested self-exclusion, therefore we were forced to reject this complaint."
Well, why would we contact the casino if our hands are literally empty? I mean, what should we demand from the caisno to secure your claim?
It is not actually accurate to say we do not contact the casinos because we do not care about the laws. On the other hand, many players from various countries still tend to play in "illegal" casinos - as you say. Thus we aim to provide casino reviews for all available casinos. We provide information, do not confuse that with promotions, please.
Automatisk oversættelse: