Jeg forstår godt, at det kan virke som en chokerende opdagelse for nogle, men jeg kan ikke se, hvordan dette hænger sammen med refusionerne. Mange operatører administrerer hele casinogrupperne.
Bemærket.
Jeg kan virkelig ikke komme på en mere neutral version af dette spørgsmål, så tag det venligst ikke personligt. Jeg prøver at forstå, hvorfor du er eller var berettiget til at modtage refusion. Kan du venligst hjælpe mig med at forstå det?
Jeg synes, det er almindeligt, at spillere fra stærkt regulerede markeder føler, at de burde få refunderet deres penge. Jeg forstår bare ikke den del med refusion. Det er det hele.
Så er det fordi casinoet aldrig har haft licens i Storbritannien, eller er det fordi det ikke længere har licens – ifølge din sidste besked?
Mange tak for din hjælp.
Well, I understand that it might look like a shocking discovery for some, but I don't see how this is related to the refunds. Many operators manage the entire casino groups.
Noted.
I really can't come up with a more neutral version of this question, so please do not take this personally. I'm trying to understand why you are or were entitled to receive refunds. Can you please help me understand that?
I find it common for players from highly regulated markets to feel they should be refunded. I just do not understand the refund part. That's all.
So, is this because the casino has never been licensed in the UK, or is it because it is not licensed anymore—according to your last message?
Thank you very much for helping me out.
Automatisk oversættelse: