Fordi det er sådan, Mastercard har fastsat deres vilkår for tilbageførsler, irriterende nok.
Jeg har haft dette problem med min bank. Jeg bestred en række transaktioner som varer, der ikke var modtaget, men banken kom til mig og sagde, at de havde undersøgt transaktionerne og besluttet, at det var betalinger til gambling. For at gøre dette skal de enten spore transaktionerne fra os > tredjepartsforhandler > casino, eller som jeg formoder er tilfældet, tjekker de denne tråd, Trustpilot og deler data.
Hvilket, hvis det er tilfældet, betyder, at de er mere end i stand til at blokere transaktionerne eller inddrive vores penge ved at opkræve varen som umodtaget.
Mastercard er dog helt klare på, at transaktioner vedrørende hasardspil ikke er berettiget til chargebacks, medmindre pengene ikke når frem til din konto.
Because that is how Mastercard set their terms for chargebacks, annoyingly.
I have had this problem with my bank. I disputed a load of transactions as goods not received, but the bank came bank to me and said that they had investigated the transactions and decided they were gambling payments. In order to do this, they must either track the transactions from us > 3rd party merchant > casino or as I supect to be the case, they are checking in on this thread, trustpilot and sharing data.
Which, if that is the case, means they are more than capable of blocking the transactions or recouping our money by charging back as good not received.
However, Mastercard are quite clear that transactions for gambling are not eligble for chargebacks unless the money doesn't arrive in your account.
Automatisk oversættelse: