Kære Dominika,
Tak endnu engang for at du tog dig tid til at undersøge min sag.
For at gentage og præcisere de centrale bekymringer:
Jeg er fuldt KYC-verificeret.
Jeg havde ingen aktive bonusser.
Jeg havde foretaget succesfulde hævninger tidligere.
Min Revolut-konto og -kort blev verificeret og accepteret til indbetalinger.
Problemet startede, da jeg forsøgte at hæve min saldo og modtog flere afvisninger uden nogen klar eller ensartet forklaring. Jeg blev flere gange bedt om at "indtaste mit IBAN-nummer igen" eller at det ville blive godkendt "inden for tre timer", men der blev aldrig givet nogen advarsel om, at Revolut-metoden muligvis ikke ville blive accepteret til udbetalinger – på trods af at den var fuldt verificeret og brugt til indbetalinger. Dette er meget misvisende og rejser spørgsmålet: hvorfor verificere en betalingsmetode, hvis den ikke er berettiget til både ind- og udbetalinger? Dette burde have været adresseret i verifikationsprocessen, da jeg ikke ville være berettiget til at hæve med denne metode.
Som følge af denne forvirring, og efter flere mislykkede forsøg, blev jeg mere og mere usikker og stresset over status for mine penge. Casinoets support gav ingen klarhed, ingen direkte kommunikation fra ledelsen og ingen vejledning. Den langvarige usikkerhed udløste frustration, tvivl og til sidst impulsiv adfærd. Da jeg troede, at mine penge i bund og grund sad fast eller var tabt, annullerede jeg udbetalingen og spillede for dem. Dette var ikke en informeret eller bevidst beslutning – det var en reaktion på manglende gennemsigtighed og følelsesmæssigt pres i et spillemiljø.
Selvom jeg accepterer ansvaret for at annullere udbetalingen, skal konteksten og det miljø, som casinoet har skabt, også tages i betragtning. Casinoer har en pligt til at behandle spillere retfærdigt, kommunikere klart og støtte ansvarlig spilleadfærd, især i henhold til Curaçaos eGaming-licensstandarder. Dette afspejles i artikel 6 i Curaçaos adfærdskodeks, som understreger gennemsigtighed og fair håndtering af spillernes midler.
Som VIP-kunde forventede jeg et højere niveau af support og omsorg. Gentagne mislykkede udbetalinger burde have udløst en proaktiv gennemgang eller i det mindste en form for ledelsesmæssig indgriben. I stedet blev jeg overladt til mig selv med at gætte, hvad der var galt – og i sidste ende traf jeg en beslutning, jeg nu fortryder.
Denne situation har skabt en følelse af mistillid og skuffelse, især i betragtning af at en verificeret betalingsmetode (Revolut) blev brugt legitimt, men stadig resulterede i manglende adgang til midler uden ordentlig forklaring. Alene den uoverensstemmelse ville være dybt bekymrende for enhver spiller – for slet ikke at tale om en på VIP-niveau.
Jeg anmoder respektfuldt om, at denne sag vurderes i lyset af licenserede casinoers ansvar for at forvalte spillernes midler med klarhed, gennemsigtighed og retfærdighed. Jeg håber, at dette med Casino Gurus hjælp kan løses ikke blot ved hjælp af reglerne, men i overensstemmelse med de bredere principper for etisk spildrift.
Med venlig hilsen,
Dionyse
Dear Dominika,
Thank you once again for taking the time to look into my case.
To reiterate and clarify the core concerns:
I am fully KYC-verified.
I had no active bonuses.
I had made successful withdrawals in the past.
My Revolut account and card were verified and accepted for deposits.
The issue began when I attempted to withdraw my balance and received several rejections, without any clear or consistent explanation. I was instructed multiple times to "re-enter my IBAN" or that it would be approved "within three hours," but no warning was ever provided that the Revolut method may not be accepted for withdrawals — despite it being fully verified and successfully used for deposits. This is highly misleading, and raises the question: why verify a payment method if it is not eligible for both deposits and withdrawals?This should have been addressed in the verification process that i would not be eligible to withdraw with this method.
As a result of this confusion, and after multiple failed attempts, I became increasingly uncertain and stressed about the status of my funds. The casino’s support provided no clarity, no direct communication from management, and no guidance. The prolonged uncertainty triggered frustration, doubt, and eventually impulsive behavior. Believing my funds were essentially stuck or lost, I canceled the withdrawal and played them. This was not an informed or intentional decision — it was a reaction to a lack of transparency and emotional pressure in a gambling environment.
While I accept responsibility for canceling the withdrawal, the context and the environment created by the casino must also be taken into account. Casinos have a duty of care, particularly under Curacao eGaming licensing standards, to treat players fairly, communicate clearly, and support responsible gambling behavior. This is reflected in Article 6 of the Curacao Code of Conduct, which emphasizes transparency and fair handling of player funds.
As a VIP customer, I expected a higher level of support and care. Repeated failed withdrawals should have triggered a proactive review or at least some kind of managerial intervention. Instead, I was left alone to guess what was wrong — ultimately making a decision I now regret.
This situation has created a sense of mistrust and disappointment, especially considering that a verified payment method (Revolut) was used legitimately but still resulted in withheld access to funds without proper explanation. That inconsistency alone would be deeply troubling to any player — let alone one at VIP level.
I respectfully request that this matter be evaluated in light of the responsibilities of licensed casinos to manage player funds with clarity, transparency, and fairness. I am hopeful that with Casino Guru’s help, this can be resolved not just by the letter of the rules, but in line with the broader principles of ethical gambling operations.
Kind regards,
Dionysis
Automatisk oversættelse: