Kære Matej,
Tak for muligheden for at afklare denne sag.
Efter at have gennemgået kontohistorikken, vil vi gerne skitsere den faktuelle tidslinje og det økonomiske resultat.
Spilleren nævnte første gang eksplicit sin ludomani den 31. august via e-mail. Før denne dato var der ingen klar oplysning om ludomani eller en formel anmodning om selvudelukkelse.
Efter gennemgangen af spillerens besked blev kontoen lukket den 6. oktober. Mellem 31. august og 6. oktober foretog spilleren i alt indbetalinger på 8.820 CAD og gennemførte udbetalinger på i alt 10.730 CAD.
Som følge heraf hævede spilleren i den pågældende periode flere penge, end han indbetalte, hvilket betyder, at der ikke var noget økonomisk tab. Denne vurdering foretages selv uden at tage højde for modtagne bonusser eller salgsfremmende kreditter.
Derfor understøttes påstanden om, at spilleren led tab efter den første offentliggørelse, ikke af kontodataene, og anmodningen om tilbagebetaling af indbetalinger foretaget i denne periode kan ikke berettiges.
Med venlig hilsen,
Crowngreen-holdet
Dear Matej,
Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this case.
After reviewing the account history, we would like to outline the factual timeline and financial outcome.
The player first explicitly mentioned gambling addiction on August 31, by email. Before this date, there was no clear disclosure of gambling addiction or a formal self-exclusion request.
Following the review of the player’s message, the account was closed on October 6. Between August 31 and October 6, the player made total deposits of 8,820 CAD and successfully completed withdrawals totaling 10,730 CAD.
As a result, during the period in question, the player withdrew more funds than he deposited, meaning there was no financial loss incurred. This assessment is made even without considering any bonuses or promotional credits received.
Therefore, the claim that the player suffered losses after the initial disclosure is not supported by the account data, and the request for a refund of deposits made during this period cannot be justified.
Best Regards,
Crowngreen Team
Automatisk oversættelse: