Kære DirectionBet Casino,
Tak for dit svar.
Vi forstår fuldt ud nødvendigheden af at give teknisk tid til manuel behandling af anmodninger om selvudelukkelse, og vi støtter casinoer i tilfælde, hvor sådanne handlinger foretages inden for en rimelig tidsramme. I dette særlige tilfælde tog lukningen af spillerens konto dog tre uger, hvilket fra vores perspektiv falder langt uden for, hvad der kan anses for rimeligt.
Når et casino erkender, at en spiller har et spilleproblem, er det afgørende at træffe øjeblikkelige og effektive foranstaltninger for at forhindre yderligere skade relateret til spil - herunder at forhindre yderligere indbetalinger eller brug af eksisterende midler. Når casinoet er opmærksom på spillerens spilleproblemer, påtager det sig ansvaret for at beskytte spilleren mod yderligere skade.
I dette tilfælde angav spilleren eksplicit sit spilleproblem og anmodede om lukning af sin konto i sin anmodning om selvudelukkelse dateret 12. august. På trods af dette forblev kontoen åben, hvilket tillod fortsat spil.
Af disse grunde mener vi, at spilleren bør være berettiget til refusion af tab, der er opstået i den periode, hvor casinoet var opmærksom på spillerens spilleproblem, men undlod at træffe hurtige og passende foranstaltninger.
Jeg beder dig venligst om at oplyse spillerens fulde spilhistorik fra 12. august til datoen for kontolukningen. Send venligst den ønskede fil i CSV, XLSX eller et andet praktisk format til min e-mailadresse på [email protected] .
Tak for dit samarbejde og din rettidige opmærksomhed på denne sag.
Dear DirectionBet Casino,
Thank you for your response.
We fully understand the necessity of allowing technical time for the manual processing of self-exclusion requests, and we support casinos in cases where such actions are taken within a reasonable timeframe. However, in this particular instance, the closure of the player’s account took three weeks, which, from our perspective, falls well outside what can be considered reasonable.
When a casino acknowledges that a player has a gambling problem, it is crucial to take immediate and effective action to prevent further gambling-related harm - including preventing additional deposits or use of existing funds. Once the casino is aware of the player’s gambling issues, it assumes responsibility for safeguarding that player from further harm.
In this case, the player explicitly stated his gambling problem and requested account closure in his self-exclusion request dated August 12. Despite this, the account remained open, allowing continued play.
For these reasons, we believe the player should be eligible for a refund of losses incurred during the period in which the casino was aware of the player’s gambling problem but failed to take prompt and appropriate action.
I kindly ask that you provide the player’s full gaming history from August 12 until the date of account closure. Please send the requested file in CSV, XLSX, or another convenient format to my email address at [email protected].
Thank you for your cooperation and timely attention to this matter.
Automatisk oversættelse: