Kære Munya
Tak for din tålmodighed, og undskyld den sene respons. Som du er klar over, oplevede vi i første omgang et teknisk problem, der midlertidigt forhindrede os i at få adgang til din platform.
Med hensyn til hr. Dragan Tsvetkovski, vil vi gerne præcisere den faktuelle baggrund og kasinoets holdning.
Baseret på vores optegnelser kontaktede spilleren gentagne gange vores kundesupportteam dagligt og anmodede om gratis kontantbonusser via livechat og e-mail. Ved adskillige lejligheder, hvor sådanne anmodninger blev afvist eller der opstod forsinkelser, truede spilleren med at lukke sin konto, medmindre casinoet gav ham bonusser eller gratis midler.
Inden for dette bredere mønster af gentaget bonusrelateret pres var der én kommunikation, hvor spilleren henviste til ludomani og anmodede om permanent lukning af sin konto. Casinoet behandlede hans anmodning, og kontoen blev selvudelukket i overensstemmelse med sine procedurer.
Efter selvudelukkelsen kontaktede spilleren senere casinoet og anmodede om, at hans konto blev genåbnet, og at han fik lov til at fortsætte med at spille. Spilleren fik ikke lov til at fortsætte gennem kundesupporten. I stedet blev han instrueret i at kontakte compliance-afdelingen direkte og give en skriftlig forklaring på, hvorfor han ønskede at genåbne sin konto.
Spilleren indsendte efterfølgende sin anmodning til Compliance-afdelingen. Efter denne anmodning og 24 timer efter spillerens anmodning om genåbning blev kontoen genåbnet.
Efter genåbningen fortsatte spilleren den samme adfærd, herunder gentagne anmodninger om gratis kontantbonusser, pres på kundesupport og yderligere trusler om at lukke sin konto, hvis bonusser ikke blev tildelt.
Casinoets holdning er, at bekymringen om ansvarligt spil ikke blev ignoreret. Kontoen blev selvudelukket. Da spilleren senere anmodede om genåbning, blev sagen eskaleret uden for kundesupport og håndteret gennem Compliance-afdelingen. Genåbningen fulgte efter spillerens egen skriftlige anmodning og forklaring og var ikke et resultat af, at casinoet opfordrede ham til at fortsætte med at spille.
Vores beviser viser et gentaget mønster med at bruge trusler om kontolukning som et middel til at opnå bonusser. Den isolerede henvisning til ludomani opstod inden for denne bredere adfærd, og casinoet handlede på den ved at anvende selvudelukkelse. Den efterfølgende genåbning fulgte spillerens egen anmodning om at få adgang igen, efter at han var blevet henvist til Compliance, og efter at der var gået 24 timer fra hans anmodning.
Vi vil snarest sende dig adskillige e-mails og chattransskriptioner til gennemgang.
Hvis du har brug for yderligere afklaring eller dokumentation, står vi stadig til rådighed.
Med venlig hilsen
Godbunny Casino-teamet
Dear Munya
Thank you for your patience and apologies for the delay in reverting to you. As you are aware, we experienced a technical issue initialy which temporarily prevented us from accessing your platform.
With regards to Mr. Dragan Tsvetkovski, we would like to clarify the factual background and the Casino's position.
Based on our records, the player repeatedly contacted our customer support team, on a daily basis, requesting free cash bonuses through live chat and email. On numerous occasions, when such requests were rejected or delays occured, the player threatened to close his account unless the Casino provided him with bonuses or free funds.
Within this wider pattern of repeated bonus-related pressure, there was one communication in which the player referred to gambling addiction and requested permanent closure of his account. The Casino treated his request and the account was self-excluded in accordance with its procedures.
Following the self-exclusion, the player later contacted the Casino requesting that his account be reopened and that he be allowed to continue playing. The player was not permitted to continue through customer support. Instead, he was instructed to contact the Compliance Department directly and to provide a written explanation as to why he wished to reopen his account.
The player subsequently submitted his request to the Compliance Department. Following this request and after a period of 24 hours from the player’s reopening request, the account was reopened.
After the reopening, the player continued the same pattern of conduct, including repeated requests for free cash bonuses, pressure on customer support and further threats to close his account if bonuses were not granted.
The Casino’s position is that the Responsible Gaming concern was not ignored. The account was self-excluded. When the player later requested reopening, the matter was escalated outside customer support and handled through the Compliance Department. The reopening followed the player’s own written request and explanation and was not the result of the Casino encouraging him to continue gambling.
Our evidence shows a repeated pattern of using account-closure threats as leverage to obtain bonuses. The isolated reference to gambling addiction arose within that broader course of conduct and the Casino acted on it by applying the self-exclusion. The subsequent reopening followed the player’s own request to regain access, after he was directed to Compliance and after 24 hours had passed from his request.
We will shortly provide you with several email communications and chat transcripts for your review.
Should you require any additional clarification or supporting documentation, we remain available to provide the same.
Best Regards
Godbunny Casino Team
Automatisk oversættelse: