Hej Veronika,
Tak for dit svar.
Da jeg sendte massemailen til flere casinoer i 2020, havde jeg allerede anmodet om en permanent/ubestemt selvudelukkelse fra Mr Green gennem deres eget værktøj til ansvarligt spil.
Så vidt jeg husker, tilbød deres værktøj forskellige selvudelukkelsesperioder, såsom et par måneder, seks måneder, et år og ubestemt/permanent. Jeg valgte muligheden ubestemt/permanent. Deres egne vilkår angiver også, at hvis en ubestemt udelukkelse vælges, kan kontoen først genåbnes efter mindst et år og kun efter kundens egen anmodning.
Jeg bad aldrig Mr Green om at genåbne min konto. Tværtimod sendte jeg senere disse e-mails med en anmodning om lukning/selvudelukkelse af min konto på grund af spilleproblemer.
Desværre har jeg ikke længere Mr Greens e-mailsvar gemt.
Det, der bekymrer mig mest, er, at Mr. Green har givet modstridende forklaringer. I chatten nævnte de først slet ikke varigheden af min selvudelukkelse. Først påstod de, at jeg aldrig havde haft en konto hos dem. Efter jeg sendte dem bevis, fandt de pludselig kontoen, men hævdede, at der ikke var nogen selvudelukkelse på den. Da jeg sagde, at der helt sikkert var en selvudelukkelse, indrømmede de så, at der havde været en, men spurgte mig, hvor længe den varede.
Jeg forklarede, at det var permanent/ubestemt. Jeg havde placeret præcis den samme type udelukkelse på flere andre casinoer på samme tid, og jeg valgte altid permanent/ubestemt, hvor den mulighed var tilgængelig. Mr Green ændrede derefter deres forklaring igen og hævdede, at udelukkelsen kun havde været i et år, og at kontoen senere var blevet helt lukket, da deres hjemmeside/platform ændrede sig.
Efter min mening ændrer de deres historie gentagne gange for at undgå ansvar.
Jeg kan ikke huske at have gennemført en fuld KYC-proces på den oprindelige konto, da jeg ikke mener, at der blev anmodet om det på det tidspunkt. Mine personlige oplysninger var dog de samme: navn, adresse, e-mailadresse, telefonnummer og andre identificerende oplysninger.
Jeg oprettede den nye konto for to dage siden. Jeg tror ikke, jeg indsendte identitetsdokumenter til den nye konto, før jeg kunne indbetale og spille.
Jeg vil også gerne påpege, at en udbyder i henhold til MGA's principper for spillerbeskyttelse ikke blot bør tillade en tidligere selvudelukket spiller at få adgang med det samme, især hvis den oprindelige udelukkelse var ubestemt/permanent og relateret til spilleproblemer. En tilbagekaldelse eller nedsættelse af en ubestemt selvudelukkelse bør kræve en anmodning fra spilleren og en obligatorisk nedkølingsperiode, før adgangen genoprettes. I dette tilfælde anmodede jeg aldrig om genåbning af min udelukkede konto. I stedet kunne jeg oprette en ny konto, indbetale €560 og spille.
Derfor mener jeg, at Mr Green ikke håndhævede min selvudelukkelse korrekt og ikke opfyldte sine forpligtelser til ansvarligt spil.
Hello Veronika,
Thank you for your reply.
When I sent the bulk email to several casinos in 2020, I had already requested a permanent/indefinite self-exclusion from Mr Green through their own responsible gambling tool.
As far as I remember, their tool offered different self-exclusion periods, such as a few months, six months, one year, and indefinite/permanent. I chose the indefinite/permanent option. Their own terms also state that if an indefinite exclusion is chosen, the account may only be reopened after at least one year and only upon the customer’s own request.
I never asked Mr Green to reopen my account. On the contrary, I later sent those emails requesting account closure/self-exclusion due to gambling problems.
Unfortunately, I no longer have Mr Green’s email response saved.
What concerns me most is that Mr Green has given conflicting explanations. In the chat, they first did not mention the duration of my self-exclusion at all. At first, they claimed that I had never had an account with them. After I sent them proof, they suddenly found the account, but claimed there was no self-exclusion on it. When I said that there definitely was a self-exclusion, they then admitted that there had been one, but asked me how long it was for.
I explained that it was permanent/indefinite. I had placed the exact same type of exclusion on several other casinos at the same time, and I always selected permanent/indefinite where that option was available. Mr Green then changed their explanation again and claimed that the exclusion had only been for one year, and that the account had later been completely closed when their website/platform changed.
In my view, they are changing their story repeatedly in order to avoid responsibility.
I do not remember completing a full KYC process on the original account, as I do not believe it was requested at the time. However, my personal details were the same: name, address, email address, phone number and other identifying information.
I created the new account two days ago. I do not believe I submitted identity documents for the new account before I was able to deposit and play.
I would also like to point out that, under MGA player protection principles, an operator should not simply allow a previously self-excluded player to regain access immediately, especially where the original exclusion was indefinite/permanent and related to gambling problems. A revocation or decrease of an indefinite self-exclusion should require a request from the player and a mandatory cooling-off period before access is restored. In this case, I never requested the reopening of my excluded account. Instead, I was able to create a new account, deposit €560, and gamble.
This is why I believe Mr Green failed to properly enforce my self-exclusion and failed in their responsible gambling obligations.
Automatisk oversættelse: