Hej Jug_ears,
Jeg hedder Michal, og jeg har overtaget din klage. Jeg har gennemgået din sag, og jeg vil kontakte casinoet for at få yderligere afklaring og afgøre, om jeg kan hjælpe.
Vi vil gerne invitere NYspins Casino til at deltage i samtalen.
Kære NYspins Casino,
Jeg ville sætte pris på din afklaring af, om den primære årsag til konfiskationen af spillerens gevinster var indbetalingen fra en fælleskonto, hvor spilleren tilsyneladende er den juridiske medejer.
Selvom jeg forstår, at det generelt forventes i branchen, at spillere skal bruge betalingsmetoder, der er gyldige, udstedt af legitime institutioner og opbevares i deres navn, mener vi, at hvis en spiller overbevisende kan påvise sit juridiske ejerskab eller medejerskab af en fælles bankkonto – og at de indbetalte midler også stammer fra deres egne legitime kilder (såsom løn osv.) – så bør det faktum, at indbetalinger blev foretaget fra en fælles konto, ikke i sig selv tjene som en gyldig begrundelse for at konfiskere gevinster, der er lovligt optjent, forudsat at dette ikke har givet spilleren nogen urimelig fordel.
Jeg ser frem til dit svar.
Hvis der er faktorer, der påvirker situationen, som ikke kan offentliggøres, er du velkommen til at dele dem direkte med mig på michal.k@casino.guru
Hello Jug_ears,
I'm Michal, and I have taken over your complaint. I have reviewed your case, and I will reach out to the casino to obtain additional clarification and determine if I may be able to assist.
We would like to invite NYspins Casino to join the conversation.
Dear NYspins Casino,
I would appreciate your clarification regarding whether the primary reason for the confiscation of the player's winnings was the deposit made from a joint account, of which the player appears to be a legal co-owner.
While I understand that it is generally expected in the industry that players must utilise payment methods that are valid, issued by legitimate institutions, and held in their name, we believe that if a player can convincingly demonstrate their legal ownership or co-ownership of a joint bank account — and that the funds deposited originate as well from their own legitimate sources (such as salary, etc.) — then the fact that deposits were made from a joint account should not, by itself, serve as a valid justification for confiscating winnings that were legitimately earned, provided that this has not given the player any unfair advantage.
I'm looking forward to your response.
Should there be any factors affecting the situation that cannot be disclosed publicly, please feel free to share them with me directly at michal.k@casino.guru
Automatisk oversættelse: