Kære Yankapenchuk ,
Tak for at du har sendt os skærmbillederne af din kassehistorik. Desværre giver disse ikke yderligere indsigt i det aktuelle problem.
Kunne du venligst tjekke din spillehistorik og bekræfte, om de pågældende væddemål vises der, eller om listen kun indeholder sportsvæddemål? Hvis casinovæddemålene er synlige i din historik, bedes du også dele et skærmbillede af den sektion.
Tak på forhånd.
Kære Parik24 Casino,
Jeg er ked af, at du har det sådan. Vi beder dig om at forstå, at Klageløsningscentret eksisterer for at betjene spillere, og kun spillere er berettigede til at indsende klager. Alene denne ramme afspejler, at vores primære rolle er at tale spillernes sag.
Selvom vi stræber efter at opretholde neutralitet, har vi i tvetydige tilfælde som denne en tendens til at give spillerne fordelen af tvivlen - dette er ikke et udtryk for bias, men snarere en anerkendelse af den iboende ulempe, som spillere står over for i tvister med casinoer. Det er sandt, at spillere kan indsende unøjagtige eller endda falske påstande, men i sådanne tilfælde engagerer casinoer sig normalt og fremlægger klare, konkrete beviser for at modbevise disse påstande.
- Angående min udtalelse: "Du er den eneste part med adgang til de historiske data."
Så vidt jeg ved, er der ingen mekanisme, der giver spillere mulighed for at udtrække en omfattende saldohistorik over en valgt periode, der viser kontoafskrivninger. Spillere har typisk kun adgang til transaktions- og spillehistorik, hvilket i dette tilfælde ikke synes tilstrækkeligt. I betragtning af denne begrænsning mener jeg, at min udtalelse stadig er korrekt.
- Spilleren har ikke fremlagt nogen beviser til støtte for sine påstande.
Du nævnte, at spilleren ikke har fremlagt nogen dokumentation for at understøtte deres påstand. Spillerens rapport er dog baseret på et teknisk problem under spillet - nærmere bestemt en situation, hvor gevinster angiveligt blev afskrevet, og spilleren blev logget ud. Da spilleren kontaktede jeres supportteam, antager jeg, at problemet blev gennemgået. I sådanne tilfælde samarbejder casinoer typisk med spiludbyderen for at bekræfte, om der opstod en teknisk fejl, eller om resultatet var som forventet.
I stedet for at præcisere resultatet af den interne gennemgang, ser det ud til, at du har flyttet bevisbyrden tilbage på spilleren. Denne tilgang er bekymrende. Hvis spillerens version af begivenhederne er korrekt, hvilke beviser kan de så med rimelighed forventes at fremlægge? Skal spillere forventes at tage et skærmbillede af hvert vindende spin, bare i tilfælde af en funktionsfejl?
Når der rapporteres et teknisk problem, er standardproceduren, at casinoet undersøger hændelsen i samarbejde med spiludbyderen. Blev dette gjort, da spilleren kontaktede jeres support? Hvad var resultaterne? Hvilke handlinger foretog I?
Endelig, selvom jeg sætter pris på dit forslag til, hvordan løsningsprocessen bør forløbe, vil jeg med respekt fortsætte med at følge vores services standardprocedurer og -praksis.
Dear yankapenchuk,
Thank you for providing the screenshots of your cashier history. Unfortunately, these do not offer any additional insight into the issue at hand.
Could you please check your betting history and confirm whether the bets in question appear there, or if the list only includes sports bets? If the casino bets are visible in your history, kindly share a screenshot of that section as well.
Thank you in advance.
Dear Parik24 Casino,
I'm sorry you feel that way. Please understand that the Complaint Resolution Center exists to serve players, and only players are eligible to submit complaints. This framework alone reflects that our primary role is to advocate on behalf of the players.
While we strive to maintain neutrality, in ambiguous cases such as this, we do tend to offer players the benefit of the doubt - this is not a reflection of bias, but rather an acknowledgment of the inherent disadvantage players face in disputes with casinos. It’s true that players can submit inaccurate or even false claims, but in such instances, casinos usually engage and provide clear, concrete evidence to refute those claims.
- About my statement: "You are the only party with access to the historical data."
As far as I am aware, there is no mechanism that allows players to extract a comprehensive balance history over a selected period that would show account write-offs. Players typically have access only to transaction and betting history, which in this case does not seem sufficient. Given this limitation, I believe my statement remains accurate.
- The Player has not provided any evidence to support their claims.
You mentioned that the player has not provided any evidence to support their claim. However, the player's report is based on a technical issue during gameplay - specifically, a situation where winnings were allegedly written off and the player was logged out. Since the player contacted your support team, I assume the issue was reviewed. In such cases, casinos typically liaise with the game provider to verify whether a technical error occurred or if the outcome was as expected.
Rather than clarifying the outcome of that internal review, you appear to have shifted the burden of proof back onto the player. This approach is concerning. If the player’s version of events is accurate, what evidence could they reasonably be expected to provide? Should players be expected to capture a screenshot of every winning spin just in case of a malfunction?
When a technical issue is reported, the standard procedure is for the casino to investigate the incident in cooperation with the game provider. Was this done when the player contacted your support? What were the findings? What actions did you take?
Finally, while I appreciate your suggestion regarding how the resolution process should proceed, I will, with respect, continue following the standard procedures and practices of our service.
Automatisk oversættelse: