Jeg vil gerne indgive en klage mod Spinarium Casino.
Min Spinarium-konto blev blokeret med beskeden "Rollback-misbrug". Jeg benægter kraftigt denne beskyldning. Jeg har ikke begået noget rollback-misbrug, forsøgte ikke at opnå nogen urimelig fordel, og jeg har kun oprettet én konto på Spinarium.
På tidspunktet for blokeringen var min samlede saldo BRL 285 inklusive bonusmidler. Jeg gør dog ikke krav på nogen bonusmidler, salgsfremmende saldo eller bonusrelaterede gevinster.
Jeg anmoder kun om tilbagebetaling af mine egne indbetalte midler: BRL 249, indbetalt via Pix.
Efter blokeringen kontaktede jeg Spinariums support og bad om en formel forklaring, den specifikke klausul i servicevilkårene, der angiveligt var overtrådt, beviserne for beskyldningen, min fulde kontoudtog og refusion af mine egne indbetalte midler.
Deres første svar var generisk. De sagde, at det er imod deres servicevilkår at misbruge spil eller opnå en urimelig fordel, at de har en nultolerancepolitik, og at beslutningen om at blokere min konto er endelig og ikke kan omgøres.
Jeg præciserede derefter igen, at jeg ikke bad om bonuspenge, kun om mine egne indbetalte midler på BRL 249. Jeg bad dem også om at fremlægge de specifikke beviser, den præcise handling, der blev betragtet som misbrug, dato og tidspunkt for den påståede overtrædelse, det involverede spil eller den involverede transaktion, og den klausul i servicevilkårene, der berettigede tilbageholdelsen af min indbetaling.
Spinarium svarede senere: "Beklager, men vi yder ingen refusion."
Efter jeg bad dem om i det mindste at fremlægge beviserne for anklagen, svarede de: "Beklager, men vi er ikke forpligtet til at fremlægge bevis for jeres udelukkelse eller videregive detaljer om vores metoder, da dette kan kompromittere vores systems sikkerhed."
Efter min mening løser dette ikke problemet ordentligt. Jeg forstår, at et casino kan beskytte sine interne sikkerhedsmetoder, men jeg mener, at det stadig bør give mindst en klar forklaring, den relevante klausul i servicevilkårene og tilstrækkelig dokumentation til at retfærdiggøre tilbageholdelsen af en kundes egne indbetalte midler.
Jeg anmoder ikke om nogen bonusmidler eller kampagnegevinster. Jeg anmoder kun om tilbagebetaling af BRL 249, som var mine egne penge indbetalt via Pix.
Jeg kan fremvise kvitteringen for Pix-betalingen, skærmbilleder af beskeden om den blokerede konto og den fulde e-mailsamtale med Spinarium-support.
Ønsket løsning:
Jeg anmoder om, at Spinarium enten:
1. Refundere mine egne indbetalte midler på BRL 249; eller
2. Fremvis klar dokumentation, den nøjagtige klausul i servicevilkårene og en detaljeret forklaring, der beviser, hvorfor de er berettiget til permanent at beholde mine egne indbetalte midler.
Tak.
[redigeret]
Registreret e-mail: [redigeret]
Omstridt beløb: BRL 249
Samlet saldo på blokeringstidspunktet: BRL 285 inklusive bonusmidler
I would like to file a complaint against Spinarium Casino.
My Spinarium account was blocked with the message "Rollback abuse". I strongly deny this accusation. I did not commit any rollback abuse, did not try to gain any unfair advantage, and I only created one single account on Spinarium.
At the time of the block, my total balance was BRL 285 including bonus funds. However, I am not claiming any bonus funds, promotional balance, or bonus-related winnings.
I am only requesting the return of my own deposited funds: BRL 249, deposited via Pix.
After the block, I contacted Spinarium support asking for a formal explanation, the specific Terms of Service clause allegedly violated, the evidence supporting the accusation, my full account statement, and the refund of my own deposited funds.
Their first response was generic. They said that abusing games or gaining an unfair advantage is against their Terms of Service, that they have a zero-tolerance policy, and that the decision to block my account is final and cannot be reversed.
I then clarified again that I was not asking for bonus money, only for my own deposited funds of BRL 249. I also asked them to provide the specific evidence, the exact action considered abusive, the date and time of the alleged violation, the game or transaction involved, and the clause of the Terms of Service that justified retaining my deposit.
Spinarium later replied: "Sorry, but we do not provide any refunds."
After I asked them to at least provide the evidence supporting the accusation, they replied: "Sorry, but we are not required to provide proof of your ban or disclose any details about our methods, as this may compromise the security of our system."
In my opinion, this does not properly address the issue. I understand that a casino may protect its internal security methods, but I believe it should still provide at least a clear explanation, the relevant Terms of Service clause, and enough evidence to justify retaining a customer’s own deposited funds.
I am not requesting any bonus funds or promotional winnings. I am requesting only the return of BRL 249, which was my own money deposited via Pix.
I can provide the Pix payment receipt, screenshots of the blocked account message, and the full email conversation with Spinarium support.
Requested resolution:
I request that Spinarium either:
1. Refund my own deposited funds of BRL 249; or
2. Provide clear evidence, the exact Terms of Service clause, and a detailed explanation proving why they are entitled to permanently retain my own deposited funds.
Thank you.
[redacted]
Registered email: [redacted]
Disputed amount: BRL 249
Total balance at the time of block: BRL 285 including bonus funds
Redigeret af en Casino Guru admin
Automatisk oversættelse: