Her er et omfattende resumé (under 5000 tegn), der indfanger hele konteksten, tidslinjen og beviserne klart og neutralt – egnet til indsendelse eller eskalering:
Opsummering af problem: Tvist om Spinit 200% indbetalingsbonus
Jeg modtog en reklamemail fra Spinit, sendt af Patrick (account manager), der bød mig velkommen som ny kunde og tilbød to eksklusive velkomstpakker – en til casino og en til sportsvæddemål.
Oprindeligt tilbud (som skrevet i e-mailen)
Casino velkomstpakke
20 gratis spins – Ingen indbetaling kræves (ved at svare "Ja Casino")
200% bonus på første indbetaling: Indbetal $30 eller mere inden for 24 timer, og indbetalingen tredobles op til et maksimum på $300.
Eksempel givet i e-mailen: Indbetal $100, modtag $200 bonus = $300 i alt at spille for.
Sådan gør du krav (som angivet):
Foretag din indbetaling inden for 24 timer.
Svar på e-mailen.
Patrick ville tilføje bonussen med det samme.
Der var ingen betingelser eller omtaler af, at jeg skulle svare inden for 24 timer, kun at indbetalingen skulle foretages inden for 24 timer.
Hvad skete der
Den 22/09 foretog jeg min første indbetaling inden for 24 timer efter at have modtaget reklamemailen – og opfyldte dermed betingelsen i tilbuddet.
Jeg svarede på e-mailen og fulgte alle instruktioner, som de blev givet.
Bonussen på 200% blev dog aldrig udbetalt.
Mine opfølgninger
Den 05/10 sendte jeg en e-mail til Spinit og spurgte om den manglende bonus.
Trods adskillige opfølgninger og kontakt til support, modtog jeg intet meningsfuldt svar i næsten to uger.
Den 09/10 svarede Patrick endelig med følgende besked:
"Angående de 200% på din første indbetaling, har jeg allerede markeret det, og jeg venter bare på min managers godkendelse. Så snart han er kommet, finder vi ud af noget godt til dig - hvad enten det er en bonus, gratis spins eller en loyalitetsgestus."
Efter den besked stoppede kommunikationen igen.
Min reaktion og eskalering
Den 13/10 sendte jeg en e-mail til Patrick, hvor jeg udtrykte forvirring og frustration:
"Der står ingen steder i din reklamemail, at du skal sende en e-mail inden for 24 timer. Alt, der står, er, at du skal indbetale inden for 24 timer, hvilket jeg gjorde. Jeg fulgte alle instruktioner præcis, som du skrev dem. Jeg er målløs over, hvordan dette bliver vendt og drejet mod mig med betingelser, der aldrig blev nævnt."
Jeg gentog også:
"Jeg fulgte dine instruktioner nedenfor. Du sagde ikke, at jeg skulle sende en e-mail med det samme. Der stod —
Foretag din indbetaling inden for 24 timer. Besvar denne e-mail. Jeg tilføjer din bonus med det samme.
Spinits svar (13/10)
Patrick svarede:
"Ja, jeg sendte dig e-mailen vedrørende 200% bonussen den 22. september. Jeg kan også se, at du foretog din indbetaling samme dag, hvilket er fantastisk. Jeg modtog dog en e-mail fra dig den 5. oktober. Tilbuddet var kun gyldigt i 24 timer fra modtagelsen af e-mailen, og desværre var denne tidsramme allerede udløbet, da din anmodning kom ind."
Han konkluderede, at bonussen ikke længere kunne anvendes, men sagde, at de ville huske på mig i fremtiden.
Jeg svarede igen og påpegede at:
"Du gav mig disse eksklusive tilbud – dine egne ord. Nu går du tilbage fra dem. Hvordan skal jeg opbygge tillid?"
Jeg citerede det oprindelige reklameafsnit for at vise, at det kun krævede en indbetaling inden for 24 timer, ikke en e-mail inden for 24 timer.
Tidligere ombytning (12/10)
Før det, den 12/10, havde jeg også skrevet:
"Jeg er blevet rådet til at kontakte jer igen angående 200% bonussen på den første indbetaling. Jeg håber virkelig, at vi kan se bort fra det faktum, at jeg er ny, og at der kan gøres en undtagelse. Jeg havde virkelig glædet mig til oplevelsen."
Patrick svarede den 13/10:
"Vi har gennemgået din konto. Tilbuddet på 200% var kun tilgængeligt inden for 24 timer efter registreringen. Den tidsramme var allerede udløbet. Selvom vi ikke kan anvende det med tilbagevirkende kraft, kontakter vi dig, hvis fremtidige kampagner bliver tilgængelige."
Resumé af tvisten
I reklamemailen angav man tydeligt, at kun indbetalingen skulle foretages inden for 24 timer – der blev ikke nævnt noget om at svare inden for den tid.
Jeg indbetalte inden for 24 timer præcis som anvist.
De vilkår, de nu nævner, var aldrig inkluderet i kampagnetilbuddet.
Deres opfølgende beskeder introducerede nye betingelser med tilbagevirkende kraft, som modsiger den oprindelige e-mails klare ordlyd.
Der var en betydelig forsinkelse i kommunikationen (næsten to uger) og skiftende forklaringer.
Tilbuddet var det primære incitament for min beslutning om indbetaling.
Afvisningen af bonussen virker urimelig og uforenelig med den oprindelige kampagne, jeg modtog.
Konklusion
Denne sag afspejler dårlig kommunikation og inkonsekvent håndtering af et klart formuleret kampagnetilbud. Jeg handlede i fuld overensstemmelse med de oprindelige vilkår ved at indbetale inden for 24 timer. Casinoets senere påstand om, at jeg skulle sende en e-mail inden for 24 timer, understøttes ikke af den faktiske kampagneformulering.
Jeg søger derfor en gennemgang og korrektion, enten ved at anvende den oprindeligt lovede indbetalingsbonus på 200 % eller ved at tilbyde tilsvarende kompensation, da kampagnen var en afgørende faktor for min indbetaling og ikke blev opfyldt i henhold til de angivne betingelser.
Here’s a comprehensive summary (under 5000 characters) that captures the entire context, timeline, and evidence clearly and neutrally — suitable for submission or escalation:
Summary of Issue: Spinit 200% Deposit Bonus Dispute
I received a promotional email from Spinit, sent by Patrick (Account Manager), welcoming me as a new customer and offering two exclusive welcome packages — one for casino and one for sports betting.
Original Offer (as written in the email)
Casino Welcome Package
20 Free Spins – No Deposit Required (by replying "Yes Casino")
200% First Deposit Bonus: Deposit $30 or more within 24 hours, and the deposit would be tripled up to a maximum of $300.
Example provided in the email: Deposit $100, receive $200 bonus = $300 total to play with.
How to Claim (as stated):
Make your deposit within 24 hours.
Reply to the email.
Patrick would add the bonus right away.
There were no conditions or mentions that I must reply within 24 hours, only that the deposit must be made within 24 hours.
What Happened
On 22/09, I made my first deposit within 24 hours of receiving the promotional email — fulfilling the condition stated in the offer.
I replied to the email and followed all instructions as given.
However, the 200% bonus was never credited.
My Follow-Ups
On 05/10, I emailed Spinit asking about the missing bonus.
Despite several follow-ups and contacting support, I received no meaningful response for nearly two weeks.
On 09/10, Patrick finally replied with the following message:
"Regarding the 200% on your first deposit, I’ve already flagged it and I’m just waiting on my manager’s approval. As soon as he’s in, we’ll figure something great out for you — whether it’s a bonus, free spins, or a loyalty gesture."
After that message, communication stopped again.
My Response and Escalation
On 13/10, I emailed Patrick expressing confusion and frustration:
"There is nowhere in your promotion email that it says to email you in 24 hours. All it says is to deposit within 24 hours, which I did. I followed all directions exactly as you wrote them. I am flabbergasted at how this is being turned around on me with conditions that were never mentioned."
I also reiterated:
"I followed your instructions below. You didn’t say to email straight away. It said —
Make your deposit within 24 hours. Reply to this email. I’ll add your bonus right away."
Spinit’s Response (13/10)
Patrick replied:
"Yes, I sent you the email regarding the 200% bonus on 22nd September. I also see that you made your deposit on the same day, which is great. However, I received an email from you on the 5th of October. The offer was only valid for 24 hours from when the email was received, and unfortunately that timeframe had already passed by the time your request came in."
He concluded that the bonus could no longer be applied but stated that they would keep me in mind for future .
I responded again, pointing out that:
"You made me these exclusive offers — your own words. Now you’re going back on them. How am I supposed to build trust?"
I quoted the original promotional paragraph to show that it only required a deposit within 24 hours, not an email within 24 hours.
Earlier Exchange (12/10)
Prior to that, on 12/10, I had also written:
"I have been advised to contact you again regarding the 200% bonus on the first deposit. I do hope we can put aside the fact that I’m new and an exception can be made. I was really looking forward to the experience."
Patrick responded on 13/10:
"We’ve reviewed your account. The 200% offer was only available within 24 hours of registration. That timeframe had already passed. While we’re unable to apply it retroactively, we’ll reach out if future promotions become available."
Summary of Dispute
The promotional email clearly stated that only the deposit needed to be made within 24 hours — no mention of replying within that time.
I deposited within 24 hours exactly as instructed.
The terms they are now citing were never included in the promotional offer.
Their follow-up messages introduced new conditions retroactively, which contradict the plain wording of the original email.
There was a significant delay in communication (nearly two weeks) and changing explanations.
The offer was the primary incentive for my deposit decision.
The denial of the bonus appears to be unfair and inconsistent with the original promotion I received.
Conclusion
This case reflects poor communication and inconsistent handling of a clearly worded promotional offer. I acted in full compliance with the original terms by depositing within 24 hours. The casino’s later claim that I needed to email within 24 hours is unsupported by the actual promotional wording.
I am therefore seeking a review and correction, either by applying the originally promised 200% deposit bonus or providing equivalent compensation, as the promotion was a deciding factor in my deposit and was not honored per its stated conditions.
Automatisk oversættelse: