Kære PlayerEsp1021,
Mange tak for dit svar og for at du har givet os yderligere oplysninger om din sag. Jeg er meget ked af at høre om din oplevelse.
Først vil jeg gerne præcisere en vigtig forskel mellem en standard kontolukning og selvudelukkelse. En almindelig kontolukning forhindrer ikke nødvendigvis kontoen i at blive genåbnet i fremtiden, hvorimod selvudelukkelse er en strengere foranstaltning, der bør forhindre yderligere adgang, især hvis den blev anmodet om på grund af spillerelaterede bekymringer.
I dit tilfælde nævnte du, at du anmodede om en permanent lukning af din konto på grund af akkumulerede tab, og at casinoet bekræftede, at kontoen var lukket. Du kunne dog senere genvinde adgang og fortsætte med at spille.
For bedre at forstå situationen, vil jeg gerne bede dig om et par yderligere detaljer:
- Kan du præcisere, hvordan du præcist anmodede om kontolukningen (f.eks. via e-mail, livechat)?
- Nævnte du eksplicit problemer med spil eller anmodede du om selvudelukkelse på det tidspunkt?
- Omtrent hvornår i 2025 fandt denne anmodning sted?
- Hvordan blev din konto genåbnet – anmodede du om genaktivering, eller blev adgangen genoprettet uden din handling?
Du nævnte, at du ikke længere har adgang til din tidligere e-mailkonto. Det er forståeligt. I så fald bedes du sende os al kommunikation, du modtager fra casinoets support, især de logfiler, du har anmodet om fra dem.
Bemærk venligst, at hvis kontoen kun blev lukket (og ikke selvudelukket), kan casinoet få tilladelse til at genåbne den efter anmodning. Hvis der er indikationer på, at lukningen var relateret til spilleproblemer, kan situationen dog vurderes anderledes.
Mange tak på forhånd for dit samarbejde. Jeg ser frem til dit svar.
Med venlig hilsen,
Petra
Dear PlayerEsp1021,
Thank you very much for your reply and for providing additional details regarding your case. I’m very sorry to hear about your experience.
First, I would like to clarify an important distinction between a standard account closure and self-exclusion. A regular account closure does not necessarily prevent the account from being reopened in the future, whereas self-exclusion is a stricter measure that should prevent any further access, especially if it was requested due to gambling-related concerns.
In your case, you mentioned that you requested a permanent account closure due to accumulated losses and that the casino confirmed the account was closed. However, you were later able to regain access and continue playing.
To better understand the situation, I would like to ask you for a few additional details:
- Can you clarify how exactly you requested the account closure (e.g. via email, live chat)?
- Did you explicitly mention gambling issues or request self-exclusion at that time?
- Approximately when in 2025 did this request take place?
- How was your account reopened — did you request reactivation, or was access restored without your action?
You mentioned that you no longer have access to your previous email account. That’s understandable. In this case, please forward us any communication you receive from the casino support, especially the logs you have requested from them.
Please note that if the account was only closed (and not self-excluded), the casino may be allowed to reopen it upon request. However, if there are indications that the closure was related to gambling problems, the situation may be assessed differently.
Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation. I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Petra
Automatisk oversættelse: