Kære Pakol93,
Tak for dit detaljerede svar og for at have afklaret situationen.
Efter omhyggeligt at have gennemgået alle de oplysninger, du har givet, forstår vi, at du og din kone er et ægtepar, og at situationen ikke var et bevidst forsøg på at misbruge casinoet. Der er dog flere vigtige faktorer, der i væsentlig grad begrænser vores mulighed for at gribe ind i denne sag.
Du bekræftede at:
- Begge konti blev tilgået fra den samme enhed
- Bonusser blev hævet på kontiene
Fra vores perspektiv er det centrale problem, at når to casinokonti tilgås fra den samme enhed, har vi ingen objektiv måde at verificere, hvem der fysisk betjente enheden på et givet tidspunkt. Med andre ord kan vi ikke bevise, at to forskellige personer brugte kontiene separat, i stedet for at én person kontrollerede flere konti fra den samme enhed.
I online gamblingmiljøet bliver denne type situation ofte markeret som potentiel multi-accounting, især når der er bonusser involveret. Casinoer har generelt ret til, i henhold til deres regler for bekæmpelse af svindel og multi-accounting, at lukke konti og konfiskere gevinster, hvis de ikke pålideligt kan skelne mellem separate brugere.
Vi forstår fuldt ud, at dette kan føles uretfærdigt, især hvis der ikke var nogen intention om at bryde nogen regler. Men da vi ikke endegyldigt kan bevise, at kontiene blev drevet uafhængigt af to forskellige personer, kan vi desværre ikke anfægte casinoets beslutning eller anmode om refusion af de konfiskerede midler.
Jeg beklager meget, at vi ikke kan bringe dig mere positive nyheder i denne sag.
Med venlig hilsen
Veronika
Dear Pakol93,
Thank you for your detailed reply and for clarifying the situation.
After carefully reviewing all the information you provided, we understand that you and your wife are a married couple and that the situation was not an intentional attempt to abuse the casino. However, there are several important factors that significantly limit our ability to intervene in this case.
You confirmed that:
- Both accounts were accessed from the same device
- Bonuses were claimed on the accounts
From our perspective, the key issue is that when two casino accounts are accessed from the same device, we have no objective way to verify who was physically operating that device at any given time. In other words, we are unable to prove that two different individuals were using the accounts separately, rather than one person controlling multiple accounts from the same device.
In the online gambling environment, this type of situation is commonly flagged as potential multi-accounting, especially when bonuses are involved. Casinos are generally entitled, under their anti-fraud and anti-multi-accounting rules, to close accounts and confiscate winnings if they cannot reliably distinguish between separate users.
We fully understand that this may feel unfair, particularly if there was no intention to break any rules. However, since we are unable to conclusively demonstrate that the accounts were operated independently by two different individuals, we unfortunately cannot challenge the casino’s decision or request a refund of the confiscated funds.
I’m very sorry that we cannot bring you more positive news in this case.
Best regards
Veronika
Automatisk oversættelse: