Hej alle sammen,
Efter omhyggelig gennemgang af alle oplysninger og beviser fra begge sider, herunder bonushistorik, optagelser af aktiveringsflow, uddrag fra supportchat og yderligere materiale indsendt af casinoet via e-mail, er jeg nået til min endelige konklusion vedrørende denne sag.
Baseret på den tilgængelige dokumentation finder jeg, at casinoet tilstrækkeligt har påvist, at den omstridte bonus på anden indbetaling ikke blev anvendt automatisk, men krævede et aktivt valg fra spillerens side under indbetalingsprocessen. De fremlagte optagelser viser tydeligt, at spilleren havde mulighed for enten at aktivere eller afvise bonussen, før indbetalingen blev gennemført.
Derudover indikerer supportchatten, som casinoet har delt, at spilleren var klar over bonussens eksistens og specifikt diskuterede den maksimale gevinstgrænse, der er forbundet med den. Casinoets optegnelser er også konsistente med hensyn til aktiveringstidsstempel, gennemført indsats og efterfølgende anvendelse af det maksimale udbetalingsloft i henhold til bonusvilkårene.
Selvom jeg forstår spillerens frustration over resultatet, fik jeg ikke tilstrækkelig dokumentation for, at bonussen blev aktiveret uden samtykke eller anvendt forkert af systemet.
Af disse grunde kan jeg ikke konkludere, at casinoet handlede uretfærdigt i denne sag.
Som følge heraf vil denne klage nu blive afvist.
Tak til jer begge for jeres samarbejde under hele efterforskningen.
Med venlig hilsen,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Hello everyone,
after carefully reviewing all the information and evidence provided by both sides, including the bonus history, activation flow recordings, support chat excerpts, and the additional materials submitted by the casino via email, I have reached my final conclusion regarding this case.
Based on the available evidence, I find that the casino has sufficiently demonstrated that the disputed second deposit bonus was not applied automatically, but required an active selection by the player during the deposit process. The provided recordings clearly show that the player had the option to either activate or decline the bonus before completing the deposit.
Additionally, the support chat shared by the casino indicates that the player was aware of the existence of the bonus and specifically discussed the maximum win limitation connected to it. The records provided by the casino are also consistent regarding the activation timestamp, wagering completion, and subsequent application of the maximum payout cap according to the bonus terms.
While I understand the player’s frustration with the outcome, I was not provided with sufficient evidence proving that the bonus was activated without consent or incorrectly applied by the system.
For these reasons, I am unable to conclude that the casino acted unfairly in this case.
As a result, this complaint will now be rejected.
Thank you both for your cooperation throughout the investigation.
Best regards,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Automatisk oversættelse: