Jeg er stadig overrasket over, at et casino, der åbner lukkede konti, som de ved tilhører ludomaner, kan have så høj en sikkerhedsvurdering. Her er det vigtigt at sige, at de åbnede min konto, uden at jeg havde bedt dem om det, ligesom de også bare valgte at skrive en mail til mig for at sige, at kontoen nu var åben, og at det var dem i deres gode ret til.
Når jeg skriver, at de vidste det godt, har jeg allerede fortalt om, hvordan de har indrømmet, at det var en fejl, men ikke ønsker at fortryde skaden. Dit svar på min klage var: Vi kan ikke bevise, at din konto blev lukket på grund af ludomani - dette på trods af at de indrømmede, at de havde åbnet min konto ved en fejl.
Kære Casino Guru. Et casino, der åbner lukkede konti, som de godt ved hører til ludomaner og endda sender dem en mail for at fortælle, at deres konto nu er åben igen, må på ingen måde have så høj en sikkerhedsvurdering. Jeg kan simpelthen ikke forstå, at du ikke tager afstand fra den slags!
I am still amazed that a casino that opens closed accounts that they know belong to gambling addicts can have such a high safety rating. Here it is important to say that they opened my account without my having asked them to, just as they also just chose to write me an email to say that the account was now open and that it was them in their good right to.
When I write that they knew very well, I have already told you about how they have admitted that it was a mistake, but do not want to undo the damage. Your response to my complaint was: We cannot prove that your account was closed due to gambling addiction - this despite admitting they had opened my account by mistake.
Dear Casino Guru. A casino that opens closed accounts, which they know very well belong to gambling addicts and even sends them an email to say that their account is now open again, must in no way have such a high safety rating. I simply cannot understand that you do not distance yourself from this kind of thing!
Automatisk oversættelse: