Hej Jaro! Ja, de fleste af gevinsterne kom fra at spille spilleautomater.
Forståeligt, men at afvise klagen endnu en gang baseret på, hvad operatøren nævnte som årsag, giver dig ikke et godt indblik. Dette problem var primært et casinoproblem, jeg ændrede formuleringen og præsenterede det i den opdaterede/genindsendte klage. Da hele den udbetalbare saldo primært blev satset på spilleautomater, blev de fleste midler derfor vundet der. Sport som kategori var en mindre tilføjelse, selvom det var årsagen til min suspendering.
Jeg placerede mig på det samme NBA-hold for at vinde live. Ikke handicaps, kun vindermarkedet/det specifikke hold, der vinder.
Identiske væddemål = Samme udfald, normalt brugt til at misbruge limits, men ikke i mit tilfælde. Holdet jeg satsede på vandt, og det talte som et identisk væddemål, selvom jeg satsede på forskellige odds samt forskellig periode og ikke burde tælle som det.
Jeg formåede at løse denne sag internt ved at sende et formelt dokument og forklare min side i deres klagemail. Jeg vil anbefale alle andre spillere at gøre det samme primært, da der vil blive foretaget en grundig kontrol. Selvom anmeldelsessider og fora kan bruges til at advare andre, er den hjælp, du vil modtage, ikke garanteret eller endda god nok, da afvisningen af min klage viste præcis det.
Jeg vender sandsynligvis tilbage på denne side, når mine midler er modtaget fuldt ud, så andre spillere kan se dem.
Hello Jaro! Yes, most of the winnings came from playing slots.
Understandable, but rejecting the complaint once more based on what the operator brought up as the reason doesn't give you a good look. This issue was primarily a casino one, I changed the wording and presented that in the updated/resubmitted complaint. As all of the withdrawable balance got primarily wagered on slots, most of the funds were therefore won there. Sport as a category was a smaller addition although the reason for my suspension.
I placed on the same NBA team to win live. Not handicaps, only winners market/the particular team to win.
Identical bets = Same outcome, usually used to abuse limits, but not in my case. The team I bet on won and that counted as an identical bet even though betting on different odds as well as different quarter and shouldn't count as so.
I managed to internally resolve this case by sending a formal document and explaining my side to their complaints email. Would recommend all other players to do so primarily, as a thorough check will take place. While review sites and forums may be used to warn others, the assistance you will recieve is not guaranteed or even good enough, as my complaint being rejected showed exactly that.
Will likely report back on this page once my funds have been recieved in full for other players to see.
Automatisk oversættelse: