Hej igen.
Dette forums mest afgørende funktion er at give spillere så meget specifik information som muligt for at forhindre dem i at for eksempel gentage deres egne eller andres fejl. Ved at tale om hvert scenarie håber vi at holde spillerne sikre. Derfor ville det være fuldstændig skødesløst at overse det ved denne særlige lejlighed. Du har dog truffet den kedelige beslutning at være hård og få os til kun at være enige med dig. Sådan fungerer det ikke her.
Det er okay, at du bliver ved med at sige, hvad du synes. Du skal dog også vise andre respekt.
For eksempel er dette et tankevækkende koncept:
"I normale kasinoer er der ingen sådanne regler. Disse regler indføres udelukkende af projekter med lille kapital i tilfælde af forsikring, for ikke at udbetale en stor gevinst"
Jeg kan garantere, at ethvert casino, uden en klar begrundelse eller en administrators beslutsomhed, "har ret" til at nægte service til spillere. Den måde, kasinoet implementerer denne regel på for spillere, er det afgørende.
Det fungerer sådan i visse situationer, men jeg siger ikke, at dette er den bedste måde at håndtere spillere på. Som jeg nævnte tidligere, ved vi ikke, hvorfor de valgte at indføre restriktioner, og jeg vil også gerne have i det mindste en afklaring.
Under alle omstændigheder erkender jeg, at du mener, at et kasino med et højt sikkerhedsindeks skal tilbyde lynhurtige udbetalingstider, men den antagelse er forkert.
Sikkerhedsindekset viser per definition dine chancer for at få gevinsten, men det angiver ikke hvor hurtigt. Se venligst brugerklager og anmeldelser for denne form for information. Jeg forestiller mig, at dette ikke er indlysende ved første øjekast, så vi sammensætter en detaljeret guide, der forklarer, hvordan man forstår sikkerhedsindekset, og hvordan man får den maksimale mængde information ud af hjemmesiden - det hele er forklaret i guidesektionen 👈
"Som et tegn på kvalitet er du for længst holdt op med at indgyde tillid med sådanne vurderinger for fidusprojekter! Halvdelen af dine topkasinoer har mange klager og negative anmeldelser. Du kan ikke engang skelne en falsk anmeldelse fra en rigtig."
Jeg anerkender, at adskillige kasinoer med et højere sikkerhedsindeks også har et højt antal klager og ugunstige brugeranmeldelser. Et par ting om det emne:
- Da flere spillere foretrækker at spille på store, udenlandske kasinoer, vil der formentlig komme flere klager mod dem. Disse kasinoer foretrækker også at arbejde med klageteamet for at øge sandsynligheden for, at de klager, der er indgivet mod dem, bliver løst. Spillere vinder på sådanne casinoers simple ønske om at undgå at give indtryk af, at de er ligeglade. Sagt anderledes, er det bydende nødvendigt at tage hensyn til, om klagerne er blevet løst eller ej. Fordi de straffes for hver uafklaret sag, vil kasinoer med et højt antal uafklarede klager ende med et lavere sikkerhedsindeks.
- Brugeranmeldelser er ubeviste oplysninger leveret af spillere. Når det er sagt, inkluderer vi ikke brugervurderingen i sikkerhedsindekset. Men lad mig bruge dig som eksempel. Forestil dig at skrive, hvad du har oplevet i casinoet. Alle, der spiller, er velkomne til at læse din anmeldelse og finde ud af, hvad den betyder for dem. Ikke alle ville forstå, hvorfor du blev bortvist fra kasinoet, og oplysningerne om langsomme udbetalinger ville ikke indeholde alle detaljer, der forklarer forsinkelsen (vi ville helt sikkert have brug for en fra kasinoet til at forstå det). Vi er ikke i stand til kvantitativt at bestemme værdien af denne type information, så længe den ikke kan kategoriseres, men den er tilgængelig for andre og falder ikke ind under sikkerhedsindekset. Jeg er enig i, at det ikke er en ideel løsning, det er dog den bedste, vi har i øjeblikket.
- "Du kan ikke engang skelne en falsk anmeldelse fra en rigtig." For at være helt ærlig kan ingen i disse dage. Vi er begrænset i, hvad vi kan gøre, så længe enkeltpersoner bliver kompenseret for at indsende falske brugeranmeldelser genereret af kunstig intelligens. Alligevel gennemgår vi hver brugeranmeldelse med den største omhu. Hvis du kender en praktisk løsning, så del venligst din ekspertise.
Jeg foreslår, at vi lægger vores følelser til side og kommer til en gentleman's agreement. Undgå at komme med sårende personlige bemærkninger, gør en indsats for at være forstående, sæt dig ind i vores processer og procedurer, og giv derefter høfligt udtryk for dine meninger. Du ved, det er så meget lettere at kritisere noget, du ikke ved, end at prøve at lære nok til at bidrage til samtalen.
Jeg har lært så meget af folk med dit perspektiv. Jeg håber, du indser, at dette er et venligt sted, hvor jeg ikke forsøger at skjule noget. Alt andet er op til dig.
Hi again.
This forum's most crucial function is to give players as much specific information as possible to prevent them from, say, repeating their own or other people's mistakes. By talking about every scenario, we hope to keep the players safe. Therefore, it would be utterly careless to overlook that on this particular occasion. However, you have made the callous decision to be harsh and make us only agree with you. This is not how it works here.
It is okay that you keep saying what you think. However, you also need to show others respect.
For example, this is a thought-provoking concept:
"In normal casinos there are no such rules. These rules are introduced exclusively by projects with small capital in case of insurance, so as not to pay out a large win"
I can guarantee that, absent a clear justification or an administrator's determination, any casino "has the right" to refuse service to players. The way the casino implements this rule for players is what matters.
It works like that in certain situations, but I am not saying this is the best way to handle players. As I mentioned earlier, we do not know why they chose to impose restrictions, and I would also like at least some clarification.
In any event, I recognize that you believe a casino with a high Safety Index has to offer lightning-fast withdrawal times, but that assumption is incorrect.
By definition, the Safety Index shows your chances of getting the winnings, but it does not indicate how soon. Please look through user complaints and reviews for this kind of information. I imagine this is not obvious at first glance, so we put together a detailed guide explaining how to understand the Safety index and how to get the maximum amount of information out of the website - it is all explained in the Guide Section 👈
"As a sign of quality, you have long ceased to inspire confidence with such ratings for scam projects! Half of your top casinos have a lot of complaints and negative reviews. You can't even tell a fake review from a real one."
I acknowledge that numerous casinos with a higher Safety Index also have a high number of complaints and unfavorable user reviews. A few things about that topic:
- Since more players prefer to play at large, foreign casinos, there will probably be more complaints filed against them. These casinos also favor working with the Complaint Team in order to increase the likelihood that the complaints submitted against them will be resolved. Players gain from such casinos' simple desire to avoid giving the impression that they do not care. Stated differently, it is imperative to take into account if the complaints have been resolved or not. Because they are penalized for each unresolved case, casinos with a high number of unresolved complaints will end up with a lower Safety Index.
- User review are unproven information provided by players. Having said that, we do not include the user rating in the Safety Index. But let me use you as an example. Imagine writing what you have experienced in the casino. Everyone who plays is welcome to read your review and determine what it means to them. Not everyone would understand why you werexpelled from the casino, and the information about slow withdrawals would not include all the details explaining the delay (we would definitely need someone from the casino to understand that). We are unable to quantitatively determine the value of this type of information as long as it cannot be categorized, but it is accessible to others and does not fall under the Safety index rating. I agree that it is not an ideal solution, it is the best we currently have though.
- "You can't even tell a fake review from a real one." To be completely honest, these days, nobody can. We are limited in what we can do as long as individuals are compensated for submitting phony user reviews generated by artificial intelligence. Still, we review each user review with the utmost care. If you know of a practical solution, please share your expertise.
I propose that we set aside our emotions and come to a gentleman's agreement. Avoid making hurtful personal remarks, make an effort to be understanding, familiarize yourself with our processes and procedures, and then politely voice your opinions. You know, it is so much easier to criticize something you do not know about than to try to learn enough to contribute to the conversation.
I have learned so much from people with your perspective. I hope you realize that this is a friendly place where I am not trying to hide anything. Everything else is up to you.
Automatisk oversættelse:
