Tak også. Jeg prøvede at sige, at i nogle casinoer anses en lavrisiko-spillestil for at være imod reglerne, fordi hvidvaskning af penge kræver lavrisiko-indsatser. Men jeg tror, vi begge føler, at manglende kontekst kan føre til en ret irrationel brug af disse regler.
Min fejl, jeg mente ikke at blande ansvarligt spil ind i det.
Jeg ville ønske, jeg vidste, hvorfor casinoet er så interesseret i alle de detaljer; det eneste, jeg kan komme på nu, er, at de følger et bestemt mønster, der bruges af en gruppe spillere, og af en eller anden grund blev du på en eller anden måde inkluderet. Men det er bare en antagelse, intet andet.
Det er svært at anbefale noget, så længe vi begge ikke forstår, hvad der er sket. Jeg ville nok samarbejde med casinoet for at få pengene tilbage og så forlade stedet. Jeg forstår, at sådan en oplevelse ikke er særlig betryggende for et muligt fremtidigt samarbejde.
Thank you too. I was trying to say that in some casinos a low-risk playstyle is considered against the rules because money laundering requires low-risk bets. But I guess we both feel that lack of context can cause quite irrational usage of those rules.
My bad, I didn't mean to bring responsible gambling into that.
I wish I knew why the casino is so interested in all those details; the only thing I can come up with now is that they are following a certain pattern used by a group of players and for some reason, you were somehow included. Yet it is just an assumption, nothing else.
Hard to recommend anything as long as we both do not understand what has been happening. I would work with the casino to get the money back and then leave, I guess. I understand such experience is not very reassuring for possible future cooperation.
Automatisk oversættelse: