Den max. bet-reglen er en standardregel, der anvendes på de fleste bonusser. Det er meget sjældent at finde en bonus, der ikke har denne regel knyttet til sig.
Jeg kan i hvert fald forestille mig en situation, hvor selvom spilleren bryder denne regel, ville det ikke være rimeligt at annullere alle gevinster. Reglen eksisterer for at sikre, at spilleren skal spille et vist antal spins med bonussen, før de opfylder omsætningskravet. Det mindsker selvfølgelig spillerens chancer for at opfylde omsætningskravet, og det reducerer også chancen for, at en spiller får nogle store gevinster, mens han spiller med bonuspenge. Det er derfor, størrelsen af indsatser er begrænset. Bare hvis det rent faktisk sker, og spilleren vinder meget, så kommer en anden regel i spil - "maks. udbetalingsgrænse fra en bonus"
På den anden side husker jeg adskillige lejligheder, hvor vi favoriserede spilleren, når det kom til at bryde denne regel. Det er typisk i et tilfælde, hvor spilleren spiller mange spins, men overskrider max. satse en eller to gange uden at vinde noget fra det. I et sådant tilfælde er det tydeligt, at spilleren lige har lavet en fejl, som kan ske, når du satser hundredvis eller tusindvis af spins på forskellige spil. Det faktum, at spilleren ikke havde nogen væsentlig gevinst fra spindet, viser også, at spilleren ikke fik nogen uretfærdig fordel ved at lave fejlen.
Vi beder også kasinoer om at se på disse sager som individuelle sager. Du skal ikke bare annullere gevinsterne, fordi max. væddemålsreglen blev overtrådt. Det er nødvendigt at se på andre indsatser, spillerens adfærd osv.
The max. bet rule is a standard rule applied to most of bonuses. It's very rare to find a bonus that doesn't have this rule attached to it.
Anyway, I can imagine a situation where even though the player breaches this rule, it wouldn't be fair to void all winnings. The rule exists in order to make sure that the player needs to play a certain amount of spins with the bonus before they complete the wagering requirement. Of course, that decreases the players chances on completing the wagering requirement and it also reduces the chance that a player gets some huge winning while playing with bonus money. That's why the size of bets is capped. Just in case it actually happens and the player wins a lot, then another rule comes in play - the "max. withdrawal limit from a bonus"
On the other hand, I remember numerous occasions when we favoured the player when it came to breaching this rule. It's typically in a case when the player plays a lot of spins, but breaches the max. bet one or two times without winning anything from it. In such a case, it's clear that the player just did a mistake which can happen when you wager hundreds or thousands spins on various games. The fact the player didn't have any significant win from the spin also shows that the player didn't get any unfair advantage by doing the mistake.
We also ask casinos to look at these cases as individual cases. You shouldn't just void the winnings because the max. bet rule was breached. It's necessary to look at other bets, the player's behaviour etc.
Automatisk oversættelse: