Det er ikke det, FOS spørger om. Paul, der siger, at betalingerne er svigagtige, og at hans kortoplysninger er blevet brugt af en anden, betragtes som bedrageri af bankerne og FOS. Hvordan betalingen rent faktisk behandles er irrelevant. De ser på, hvordan betalingen oprindeligt blev foretaget, hvorfor jeg har rådet til ikke at gå den vej. Der er alt for meget information, de kan undersøge eller bede banken om at slette sagen direkte, hvis han antydede, at det ikke var ham, der foretog betalingerne. IP-adresse, adressetilpasning på fil, enheds-id... det er ikke det værd.
kommer fra en, der arbejder for en bank.
This isn’t what the FOS are asking. Paul stating the payments are fraudulent and his card details have been used by someone else is looked at as fraud by the banks and the FOS. How the payment is actually processed is irrelevant. They are looking at how the payment was initially made which is why I have advised to not go down that route. There is far too much info they can investigate or ask for the bank to wipe the case straight out if he did suggest it was not him that made the payments. IP address, Address Matching on file, Device Id… it’s not worth it.
coming from someone who works for a bank.
Automatisk oversættelse: