Hej Radka,
Hvad er din mening eller Casino Gurus team for hele denne situation? Jo dybere du graver i problemerne med købmandsfejl, jo mere vil du finde ud af, at denne ordning er ved at blive sat op for at kunne indsamle flere indskud fra (problem-)spillere, da deres banker ikke vil have mistanke om, at det er et kasinoindskud, der omgår potentielle grænser fra bankerne . Det er også gjort for at undgå at blive stemplet med høj risiko af banker, hvilket også kan have fordele for dem.
Den eneste positive side er, at for os spillere (hvis vi ender med at spille på et ulovligt kasino i vores land), kan vi indgive en tilbageførsel, som i de fleste tilfælde vindes, da købmanden ikke risikerer at afsløre sin egen svindelordning 😉
Hi Radka,
What is your opinion or Casino Guru's team for this whole situation? The deeper you dig into the merchant miscoding issues the more you will find out that this scheme is being set up to be able to collect more deposits from (problem) gamblers as their banks would not suspect its a casino deposit bypassing potential limits from the banks. It also is done to avoid being labelled high risk by banks which could have benefits for them too.
The only positive side is that for us players (if we end up gambling on an illegal casino in our country) that we can file a chargeback which in most cases is won as the merchant wont risk to expose his own fraud scheme 😉
Automatisk oversættelse: