Jeg tror, det er ligegyldigt. Bonusser giver dig en gratis chance for at vinde, men det indebærer også en masse krav. Hvis jeg lavede en indbetaling, ville jeg aldrig tage en bonus med den, fordi det potentielt kan give mig problemer senere (casinoer har meget forskellige regler, men for eksempel kan du vinde, mens du spiller med dine egne penge, men dine gevinster ville være begrænset , fordi du tog en bonus osv.)
I tilfælde af bonusser uden indskud, ville jeg ikke spilde tid på at spille bonusser med for højt omsætningskrav eller ekstremt lavt maksimalt udtræk. Men lad os sige, at hvis du får en gratis bonus, hvor du kan hæve 100 dollars, og du skal satse den 30x, så kan du prøve det.
I think it doesn't really matter. Bonuses give you a free chance of winning, but it also involves a lot of requirements. If I made a deposit, I'd never take a bonus with it, because it could potentially cause me troubles later (casinos have very different rules, but for example you could win while playing with your own money, but your winnings would be limited, because you took a bonus etc.)
In case of no deposit bonuses, I wouldn't waste time on playing bonuses with too high wagering requirement or extremely low maximum withdrawal. But let's say if you get a free bonus where you can withdraw 100 dollars and you need to wager it 30x, then you can give it a try.
Automatisk oversættelse:
