Hej,
det gør en væsentlig forskel HVIS gevinsterne fra en bonus, du tog, var begrænset af reglen om maksimal udbetaling, er denne regel stadig aktiv, indtil bonussen slutter.
Derfor skrev jeg, at bonusser normalt ender med at sende udbetalingen, eller når saldoen falder til nul. På det tidspunkt anvendes den maksimale udbetaling fra bonussen, og resten af gevinsten annulleres. Forestil dig nu, at du indbetaler igen, fordi din saldo NÆSTEN gik til nul, mens en sådan bonus er aktiv, ville det betyde, at den maksimale udbetalingsregel stadig er aktiv, bonussen er stadig aktiv, uanset hvor meget du indbetalte i alt. Dine gevinster er stadig begrænset.
Jeg ved ikke, hvilken bonus du tog, eller om der var eller ikke var den maksimale udbetalingsbetingelse anvendt.
Dette er netop, hvad jeg fandt for at være den mest sædvanlige årsag til sådanne situationer.
lad os vente på konklusionen, jeg håber du bliver tilfreds.🤞
Hello,
it makes a significant difference IF the winnings from a bonus you took were limited by the maximum cashout rule, this rule is still active until the bonus ends.
That's why I wrote that bonuses usually end by submitting the withdrawal, or when the balance drops to zero. At that moment the max cashout from the bonus is applied and the rest of the winnings is voided. Now imagine that you deposit again because your balance went ALMOST to zero, while such a bonus is active, that would mean that that the maximum cashout rule is still active, the bonus is still active, no matter how much you deposited in total. Your winnings are still capped.
I do not know what bonus you took or if there was or was not the max cashout condition applied.
This is just what I found to be the most usual cause of such situations.
let's wait for the conclusion, I hope you'll be satisfied.🤞
Automatisk oversættelse: