Der var andre transaktioner involveret.
Jeg havde indbetalt mange gange før, det var langt fra min første indbetaling, men bestemt min første udbetalingsanmodning. Sidst jeg hørte fra dem var den 25. september tror jeg. Det var bare det samme, som vi ønsker endnu mere af dine personlige økonomiske oplysninger. Vi er vel ved at være umulige. Du ønsker endnu et kontoudtog med en positiv saldo. Jeg nægter at give dem endnu et kontoudtog, fordi formålet med kontoudtoget er at bekræfte, at min konto er åben og aktiv, hvilket den konto, jeg gav dem, mere end beviser det. Og det er dem, der fortalte mig formålet med udtalelsen BTW. Der er mere end 7.000 dollars i aktivitet på den erklæring, der ender med en saldo på -14$. Jeg synes, det er uetisk, at de overhovedet har kigget på min saldo, og at de rent faktisk bruger min saldo til at nægte min udbetaling går langt ud over det uetiske. Og hvordan kan det være, at der ikke er nogen supervisor eller nogen højere oppe at tale med om dette? Det blæser mig bare væk, at ingen kan forstå, hvor forkert det er at have kigget på min balance endsige bruge den imod mig, især når deres egen kundeservicemedarbejder fortalte mig, hvordan den skulle bruges.
There were other transactions involved.
I had deposited many times before, it was far from my first deposit but certainly my first withdrawal request. The last time I heard from them was on sep25th I think. It was just the same ol we want even more of your personal financial information speel. We're at an impossible I guess. Thy want another bank statement with a positive balance. I refuse to give them another bank statement because the purpose of the bank statement is to verify that my account is open and active which the statement I gave them more than proves that. And they are the ones that told me the purpose of the statement BTW. There's more than 7,000 dollars of activity on that statement that ends with a -14$ balance. I think its unethical for them to have even looked at my balance, and for them to actually use my balance against meor to deny my payout goes waay beyond unethical. And how is it that there's no supervisor or anyone higher up to talk to about this? It just blows me away that nobody can understand how wrong it is to have even glanced at my balance let alone use it against me especially when their own customer service rep told me how it was supposed to be used.
Automatisk oversættelse:
