Kære Winstoria Casino Team,
Selvom den endelige beslutning allerede var truffet, vil jeg gerne forklare den fra vores synspunkt.
Du hævder, at du er mere end sikker på, at klienten gjorde det med vilje for at omgå blokeringen, men det er svært at bevise det. Derfor bad jeg dig om yderligere data ovenfor. Desuden udfyldte spilleren sit rigtige navn, efternavn og fødselsdato i registreringsformularen. Hvis dette var korrekt håndhævet af systemet, som du sagde, ville det ikke blive håndhævet baseret på personlige data, som kan ændres fra tid til anden, især i tilfælde af, at der gik lang tid mellem registreringerne i forskellige kasinoer. Kasinoet fandt ud af, at spilleren er selvudelukket i søstercasinoet kun baseret på hans oplysninger givet til kundesupporten. Vi ved ikke, om han virkelig vidste dette, før han mistede sine penge. Men vi ved, at han har et spilleproblem.
I tilfælde af at du gerne vil henvise til din regel om søsterkasinoer - der er ingen oplysninger nogen steder om, at Winstoria Casino er søstercasinoet til Stelario Casino. Så giver det ingen mening at henvise til denne regel og/eller henvende sig til regulatoren.
En vigtigere faktor førte os til den endelige beslutning - det faktum, at spilleren informerede dig om, at han har lukket konti i et andet casino på grund af et spilleproblem, og det faktum, at han skulle have en separat lukket konto på grund af et spilleproblem kl. Winstoria Casino, hvis han ville henvise til reglen om selvudelukkelse.
Pointen er, at spilleren har et spilleproblem, og han informerede kasinoet om det. Han havde mistet sine penge og forsøgte at bruge reglen om selvudelukkelse og forsøgte at anmode om at få sit depositum refunderet. Jeg tror ikke, jeg behøver at forklare det mere detaljeret.
Derudover er der ingen grund til at henvise til andre klager her. Hver sag er på en eller anden måde specifik, og jeg ved ikke, hvad resultaterne af undersøgelsen var, og omstændighederne ved enhver anden klage, og hvorfor den blev afgjort på den måde.
Konklusion - Spilleren registrerede sig hos Winstoria Casino og mistede sine penge. Kasinoet handlede korrekt og inden for sine regler for ansvarligt spil, da det lukkede spillerens konto på grund af et spilleproblem.
Kære Purnojahakka,
Efter at have indsamlet alle de nødvendige oplysninger blev det desværre besluttet, at klagen vil blive afvist. Beklager, vi var ikke i stand til at hjælpe dig med denne, men tøv ikke med at kontakte os i fremtiden, hvis du støder på problemer med dette eller et andet casino. Vi er her for at hjælpe.
Hvis du ikke er tilfreds med klageløsningen, anbefaler jeg, at du konsulterer den spillemyndighed, som casinoet er reguleret af.
Tak, Winstoria Casino Team, for dine svar og for at give information.
Med venlig hilsen,
Branislav, Casino.Guru
Dear Winstoria Casino Team,
Although the final decision was already made, I would like to explain it from our point of view.
You claim you are more than sure the client did it intentionally to bypass the blocking, but, it is hard to prove it. Therefore, I asked you for additional data above. Moreover, the player filled in his real name, surname and date of birth in the registration form. If this was correctly enforced by the system, as you stated, it would not be enforced based on personal data which can be changed from time to time, especially in the case a long time elapsed between the registrations in different casinos. The casino found out that the player is self-excluded in the sister casino only based on his information provided to the customer support. We do not know whether he knew this really earlier than he lost his money. But, we know he has a gambling problem.
In case you would like to refer to your rule about sister casinos - there is no information anywhere that Winstoria Casino is the sister casino of Stelario Casino. Then it does not make any sense to refer to this rule and/or to turn to the regulator.
A more important factor led us to the final decision - the fact the player informed you that he has closed accounts in another casino due to a gambling problem, and the fact that he would have to have a separately closed account due to a gambling problem at Winstoria Casino if he wanted to refer to the rule about self-exclusion.
The point is the player has a gambling problem and he informed the casino about it. He had lost his money and tried to use the rule about self-exclusion and tried to request his deposit to be refunded. I think I do not have to explain it in more detail.
In addition, there is no reason to refer to any other complaints here. Every case is somehow specific and I do not know what were the results of the investigation and the circumstances of any other complaint and why it was decided in that way.
Conclusion - The player registered at Winstoria Casino and lost his funds. The casino acted correctly and within its Responsible Gaming policy rules when closed the player's account due to a gambling problem.
Dear Purnojahakka,
Unfortunately, after gathering all the necessary information, it was decided the complaint will be rejected. Sorry, we were not able to help you with this one, but please, do not hesitate to contact us in the future, if you run into any issues with this or any other casino. We are here to help.
If you are not satisfied with the complaint solution, I recommend you consult the gambling authority that the casino is regulated by.
Thank you, Winstoria Casino Team, for your replies and for providing information.
Best regards,
Branislav, Casino.Guru
Automatisk oversættelse: