The player from Netherlands, who had self-identified as a gambling addict, had lost about €10,000 in two days at the casino without any interventions. The player had accused the casino of neglecting its legal duty of care, questioned the game's random outcomes, and claimed it operated without a Dutch license. The player was seeking a full reimbursement. After we reviewed the case, we found that the player had not made any deposits after his self-exclusion request. We also clarified that we could not assist with complaints related to licensing regulations and suggested the player contact the licensing authority directly. Consequently, the complaint was rejected.
Spilleren fra Holland, der selv havde identificeret sig som ludoman, havde tabt omkring €10.000 på to dage på kasinoet uden nogen indgreb. Spilleren havde anklaget kasinoet for at forsømme dets lovpligtige omsorgspligt, stillede spørgsmålstegn ved spillets tilfældige udfald og hævdede, at det fungerede uden en hollandsk licens. Spilleren søgte fuld refusion. Efter at vi havde gennemgået sagen, fandt vi ud af, at spilleren ikke havde foretaget nogen indbetalinger efter hans anmodning om selvudelukkelse. Vi præciserede også, at vi ikke kunne hjælpe med klager i forbindelse med licensregler og foreslog, at spilleren kontaktede licensmyndigheden direkte. Klagen blev derfor afvist.
Automatisk oversættelse: