Ny information: Casinos sag
I dag, mens jeg nåede ud til kasinoet, fik jeg endelig at vide, hvad deres nuværende begrundelse for at tilbageholde min tilbagetrækning. Kasinoet har mishandlet mine kontotransaktioner, så det ser ud til, at jeg ikke gik ud, før jeg lavede en 3. indbetaling. Jeg har dog beviser på, at jeg gik ud. (Skærmbilleder vedhæftet)
Her er en detaljeret oversigt over situationen:
1. **Oprindelig saldo og kasinotab**: Før jeg lavede min tredje indbetaling, var min saldo $42,50. Jeg tabte derefter $42,50 ved at spille blackjack. Men i min seneste aktivitetshistorie blev dette casinotab flyttet til den følgende dag (23/06), selvom beskrivelsen af tabet stadig viser den korrekte dato (22/06 ) . Denne ændring får det til at se ud som om tabet opstod efter min tredje indbetaling.
2. Kasino bestrider min 3. indbetaling:
Min tredje indbetaling bliver bestridt af kasinoet. De hævder, at det ikke tæller b/c. Jeg modtog $20 (ingen begrænsninger) for at oprette en kryptopung med et af deres datterselskaber. Kasinoet vil acceptere, at disse $20 kom uden begrænsninger
- For at sikre, at der ikke var nogen begrænsninger eller omsætningskrav, trak jeg de $20 med succes. Denne tilbagetrækning i sig selv beviser to ting.
1. De $20, de gav mig, havde ingen begrænsninger.
2. Jeg var i stand til at foretage en udbetaling, hvilket betyder, at min kontosaldo skal have været på $0 uden omsætnings- eller gennemspilskrav, der blokerer for, at en udbetaling finder sted.
Efter at have hævet og bekræftet, at der ikke var nogen begrænsninger for kontanterne, indbetalte jeg derefter $19,80 fra denne samme kryptopung, som jeg havde finansieret med den tidligere udbetaling.
Kasinoet hævder "indbetalingen tæller ikke som en gyldig indbetaling, da pengene oprindeligt kom fra de $20, jeg tjente, da jeg oprettede tegnebogen.
**Centrale punkter**:
- Den vellykkede tilbagetrækning af $20-bonussen beviser, at der ikke var nogen begrænsninger, omsætningskrav eller rollovers på min konto på det tidspunkt.
- At være i stand til at indbetale $20 bekræfter yderligere, at min konto ikke havde nogen balance, rollover eller omsætningskrav, der forhindrede indbetalinger.
- Transaktionerne bør betragtes som separate og uafhængige handlinger.
Kasinoets håndtering af disse transaktioner virker uberettiget, og jeg formoder, at der kan være tale om svigagtig aktivitet. Jeg har forsøgt at forklare dette, men er blevet lukket ned og behandlet respektløst.
-Nick V.
New information: Casino's Case
Today while reaching out to the casino, I was finally told what their current reasoning for withholding my withdrawal. The casino has mishandled my account transactions, so it would appear that I did not bust out before making a 3rd deposit. I have proof that I did bust out though. (Screenshots attached)
Here’s a detailed summary of the situation:
1. **Initial Balance and Casino Loss**: Before making my third deposit, my balance was $42.50. I then lost $42.50 playing blackjack. However, in my recent activity history, this casino loss was moved to the following day (06/23), even though the description of the loss still shows the correct date (06/22). This alteration makes it appear as if the loss occurred after my third deposit.
2. Casino disputing my 3rd deposit:
My third deposit is being disputed by the casino. They claim it doesn't count b/c I received $20 (no restrictions) for setting up a crypto wallet with one of their affiliates. The casino will agree that this $20 came with no restrictions
- To ensure there were no restrictions or wagering requirements, I withdrew the $20 successfully. This withdrawal itself proves two things.
1. The $20 they gave me had no restrictions.
2. I was able to make a withdrawal, meaning my account balance must have been at $0 without an wagering or rollover requirements blocking a withdrawal from taking place.
After withdrawing & confirming there were no restrictions on the cash, I then deposited $19.80, from this same crypto wallet that I had funded with the previous withdrawal.
The casino is claiming "the deposit doesn't count as a valid deposit since the funds originally came from the $20 I earned when I set up the wallet.
**Key Points**:
- The successful withdrawal of the $20 bonus proves that there were no restrictions, wagering requirements, or rollovers on my account at the time.
- Being able to deposit the $20 further confirms that my account had no balance, rollover, or wagering requirements preventing deposits.
- The transactions should be considered separate and independent actions.
The casino’s handling of these transactions seems unjustified, and I suspect there might be fraudulent activity involved. I have attempted to explain this, but have been shut down and treated disrespectfully .
-Nick V.
Automatisk oversættelse: