"640K ought to be enough for anybody" — a legendary phrase attributed to Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, in 1981, during the times of creating the first IBM PC and MS DOS 1.0.
It's truly intriguing how people repeatedly quote certain axioms without attempting to shift them into a slightly different context or change the perspective. I'm not disputing the quote you've provided, no. I'm just affirming that it's valid and applicable for the time it originated and the conditions in which you place yourself in the exact context it was born, namely: sitting at a casino table with a set of chips in your hand, thinking about how to outsmart the casino. And in that scenario, you're absolutely right because this quote emerged precisely in such circumstances.
The author of the quote didn't have the ability to simultaneously access information from multiple tables, wait for favorable moments at any of them, and, after winning, observe a multitude of tables again. However, for that context, the quote you've provided operates differently. It roughly translates to: "With favorable waiting, you can outplay the casino at one of the gaming tables over a short distance, winning one or multiple gaming sessions and then discontinuing play at that specific table."
Such is the contemporary reality and context. All that remains for you to do with this is to circulate this assertion across a significant number of gaming tables in online casinos.
God eftermiddag,
Radka Jeg må sige, at jeg er uenig i dine argumenter,
Der er spillere, som, selvom de spillede 50/50 "ingen casino kommission" roulette, stadig ville være tabere, er jeg sikker på. Jeg ser hver dag, hvordan spillere spiller store mængder, der dækker en stor del af tøjet, gør fremskridt og taber alt. På et tidspunkt ville de vinde, men folk er generelt ikke tilfredse med at få en rimelig procentdel, lad os sige et afkast på 20 %.
Jeg anser især mig selv, i det mindste, ikke for en taber, jeg må sige, at når jeg får en målprocent, kommer jeg ud af spillet, det er det, der adskiller en taber fra en vinder, grådighed.
Jeg er ikke bekymret for, at europæisk roulette har en ulempe på 2,7%, hvis du er disciplineret, vil dette ikke være et problem at opnå overskud på lang sigt, det har jeg verificeret.
Det skal siges, at jeg ikke er en fritidsspiller, det er en anden profil, som jeg ikke tilhører.
You took the phrase out of context, completely altering its meaning. The essence of my statement was that winning is possible and achievable under certain conditions and within a short distance. However, you turned it into some kind of casino promotional slogan, which is absolutely incorrect and was not implied.
Let's consider a specific example.
Suppose you have access to certain "knowledge" that black numbers might not appear in roulette for more than 20-24 times in a row. And suddenly, you see that at the moment, black hasn't appeared for 20 times in a row on the roulette table. I assume that with this "knowledge," as mentioned earlier, you would place a bet. If it doesn't win, you would increase the bet within your chosen progression to win on the next spin. Either way, if your initial bet doesn't win immediately, you'd increase it for a limited number of sessions since you're using your awareness to enter the game at the right moment and exit after a win. So, on this specific table and during this specific period, you're in a winning situation compared to the casino, right?
The key is to replicate this approach across numerous tables and gaming situations that allow you to win within a short distance and then leave the game.
We aim to provide the community with proven facts - this is one of those. Keeping players informed means keeping them safe. This is our ultimate goal.
To me, you sound like you're promoting.
Speaking of which, may I remind you I deleted the link you posted on the subject leading to the advert?
Hello,
The link led to a page offering paid services - this is where my suspicion came from.
Additionally, you posted that you paid for whatever it is, and it also offers 100% winning schemes. Well, sounds like a dangerous practice to me.
"And I paid. Their menu is quite diverse: game bots (not effective, human factor matters!), calculators where you manually input data while watching the game (they do help, but are not very user-friendly), 100% winning bet schemes, progressive betting systems, and more."
It is my job to remind all players to avoid scams and always act within fair casino rules to avoid unnecessary risk. This is all I intend to add.
I would not say I'm rude - I'm cautious. 🙂
Du omdirigeres til casinoets website. Vent et øjeblik. Tjek indstillingerne, hvis du bruger software til annonceblokering.