God aften,
Mange tak, Nick, for de angivne data og detaljer. Det hjalp at overveje sagen tilstrækkeligt.
Kære Pnucci,
Baseret på de angivne data var vi i stand til at genberegne dit spil under hensyntagen til saldoen for rigtige penge og gevinsterne fra bonussen separat, og simulere spil uden de såkaldte "blandingsmidler". Jeg vil gerne forklare situationen og vores beslutning mere detaljeret.
Det lykkedes dig at vinde ved at bruge den ugentlige cashback-bonus og opfylde omsætningskravene. Den maksimale udbetaling for denne bonus er $100. Din saldo på tidspunktet for anmodningen om en udbetaling var $1195,86. Hvis der ikke havde været et problem med din udbetaling, og den var blevet behandlet med succes, ville casinoet have betalt dig $100, og resten af gevinsterne ville være blevet annulleret. Din udbetaling blev dog afvist, og $1195,86 blev returneret til din saldo. For bedre fantasi, lad os sige, at du havde $100 rigtige penge og $1095,86 "fiktive penge", som ellers ville være blevet annulleret ved en vellykket udbetaling. Derefter lavede du en indbetaling på $50, hvilket betyder, at du blandede gevinsterne fra bonussen med nye rigtige penge. Det vigtigste er, at hvis du kun havde haft $150 i din saldo med rigtige penge, ville du have mistet dem efter cirka 40 minutters spil. Men i dit tilfælde, fra det øjeblik du mistede din saldo med rigtige penge ($150), var der kun "fiktive penge", og du fortsatte med at spille med dem. Desværre kom betydelige gevinster senere - fra "fiktive penge". Da dine 2 udbetalinger ($5000) blev nægtet, mistede du den resterende saldo ved at spille, og casinoet krediterede din konto med de oprindelige $50. De blev også spillet væk. Desuden, før din konto blev krediteret med $50, var din saldo $0,09, hvilket betyder, at du var nødt til at bemærke det.
Hvad angår rigtige penge og den ugyldige del af dine gevinster fra den ugentlige cashback - en anden situation ville være opstået, hvis betydelige gevinster var blevet opnået tidligere, fra din saldo for rigtige penge ($150). I en sådan situation vil vi diskutere det yderligere med casinoet.
Selvom processerne i casinoet ikke er ideelt indstillet, er vi i stand til at acceptere det på grund af begrænsningerne i dets platform. Derfor, efter at have indsamlet og gennemgået alle de nødvendige oplysninger, lukker vi denne klage som uberettiget.
Jeg er ked af, at vi ikke kunne hjælpe dig med denne, men tøv ikke med at kontakte os i fremtiden, hvis du støder på problemer med dette eller et andet casino. Vi er her for at hjælpe.
I tilfælde af spørgsmål er du velkommen til at skrive til mig på branislav.b@casino.guru.
Med venlig hilsen,
Branislav, Casino.Guru
Good evening,
Thank you very much, Nick, for the provided data and details. It helped to consider the case sufficiently.
Dear Pnucci,
Based on the data provided, we were able to recalculate your game taking into account the real money balance and the winnings from the bonus separately, and simulate playing without the so-called "mixing funds". I would like to explain the situation and our decision in more detail.
You managed to win using the weekly cashback bonus and meet the wagering requirements. The maximum cashout for this bonus is $100. Your balance at the time of requesting a withdrawal was $1195,86. If there had not been a problem with your withdrawal and it had been processed successfully, the casino would have paid you $100, and the rest of the winnings would have been canceled. However, your withdrawal was denied and $1195,86 was returned to your balance. For better imagination, let's say you had $100 of real money and $1095,86 of "fictitious money" that otherwise would have been voided upon a successful withdrawal. Then, you made a deposit of $50, which means you mixed the winnings from the bonus with new real money. The most important thing is that if you had only had $150 in your real money balance, you would have lost them after approximately 40 minutes of playing. But, in your case, from the moment you lost your real money balance ($150), there was only "fictitious money", and you continued playing with them. Unfortunately, significant winnings came later - from "fictitious money". When your 2 withdrawals ($5000) were denied, you lost the remaining balance by playing, and the casino credited your account with the original $50. Those were gambled away too. Moreover, before your account was credited with $50, your balance was $0,09, which means you had to notice it.
As for real money and the invalid part of your winnings from the weekly cashback - a different situation would have occurred if significant winnings had been obtained earlier, from your real money balance ($150). In such a situation, we would further discuss it with the casino.
Although the processes in the casino are not ideally set, we are able to accept it due to the limitations of its platform. Therefore, after gathering and reviewing all the necessary information, we are closing this complaint as unjustified.
I am sorry we were not able to help you with this one, but please, do not hesitate to contact us in the future, if you run into any issues with this or any other casino. We are here to help.
In case of any questions, feel free to write to me at branislav.b@casino.guru.
Best regards,
Branislav, Casino.Guru
Redigeret af en Casino Guru admin
Automatisk oversættelse: