Jeg tilmeldte mig for en uge siden for at spille sport hos Sportbet.one. I går overførte jeg USDT $1000 til deres live dealer casino. Inden for 45 minutter efter at have spillet live dealer blackjack løb jeg det op til $14.705. Da jeg forsøgte at overføre min casinosaldo tilbage til sportsbooken, blev den gennemgået i 12 timer, hvorefter de overførte blot mine oprindelige $1000 tilbage til sportsbooken og fjernede alle mine gevinster, og sendte mig følgende forklaring via e-mail:
Din kasinosession #55516 blev aflyst efter resultaterne af udbyderens undersøgelse.
Det officielle svar fra udbyderen:
Kontrollerede spillerens gameplay for tegn på svigagtig aktivitet. Undersøgelsen viste, at brugeren drager fordel af at bruge shuffle-sporing og korttællingsteknikker.
Du har også overtrådt flere grundlæggende regler for vores platform:
Spilleselskabet forbeholder sig retten til at tilbagekalde den indgåede væddemålsaftale (inklusive væddemål placeret før og efter begivenhedens begyndelse), nægte at opfylde sine forpligtelser i henhold til denne aftale (herunder udbetaling af gevinster), eller nægte at returnere alle placerede væddemål , hvis:
- væddemål foretages af en gruppe kunder, der handler i en koalition for at omgå de begrænsninger, som væddemålsfirmaet har fastsat;
- klienten er mistænkt for at bruge software, der automatiserer processen med at sætte væddemål;
- klienten bruger spilkontoen til at spille i voldgiftssituationer;
Den fulde tekst af reglerne kan findes her: https://sportbet.one/rules .
Denne gang refunderer vi dit depositum og anbefaler dig på det kraftigste at følge vores platformsregler.
For det første engagerede jeg mig ikke i nogen "shuffle tracking" eller "tælleteknikker". Her er debet-/kredithistorikken for hver hånd og en video, hvor jeg gennemgår hele sessionens 89-håndshistorie, så der kan være fuldstændig gennemsigtighed af de hænder, jeg spillede, og de indsatsbeløb, jeg lavede.
https://i.postimg.cc/g2vXGJrJ/sportbetone-history.jpg
https://streamable.com/3l4kpq
Jeg ved ikke meget om blackjack-spil med fordele, men jeg har set nok film til at vide, at det er et langt stykke tid, og du vil dramatisk ændre din indsatsstørrelse baseret på antallet af bunken. Du kan se på min debet-/kredithistorik, at min session var kort (45 minutter), og jeg startede med at satse $500/hånd og varierede det med ikke mere end $100-$200 pr. hånd op til et maksimum på $1000 pr. hånd. Du kan også se af min håndhistorik, at jeg vandt 13 af mine første 17 hænder i sessionen, hvilket tegnede sig for hovedparten af mine gevinster, og det mønster, jeg udviser, er at satse lidt mere efter et løb med på hinanden følgende tab og lidt mindre efter et løb af på hinanden følgende sejre. Der ville have været et par kortblandingsændringer i denne session, men det var det konsekvente mønster, jeg udviste, og min indsatsstørrelse ændrede sig ikke væsentligt på grund af andre faktorer under min session.
Også ud af de 89 blackjack-hænder, jeg spillede, oplevede jeg et nettotab i 46 af dem og en nettogevinst i kun 43 af dem. Hvor jeg oplevede gevinster, var på sidevæddemål såsom "perfekt par" og "rummy", som ingen fordelsspillere ville deltage i. Jeg placerede omkring 20 % af min blackjack-indsats på hver eneste hånd på disse sidevæddemål og var bare heldig. der.
Så efter at de har fået denne falske forklaring fra spilleverandøren, citerer de flere regler, som jeg ville have brudt.
- væddemål foretages af en gruppe kunder, der handler i en koalition for at omgå de begrænsninger, som væddemålsfirmaet har fastsat;
- klienten er mistænkt for at bruge software, der automatiserer processen med at sætte væddemål;
- klienten bruger spilkontoen til at spille i voldgiftssituationer;
Alle disse regler: 1) syndikatspil, 2) automatiseret væddemålssoftware, 3) arbitrage er alle relateret til SPORTSBETTING. Disse har intet at gøre med casinospillet eller hvad de er falsk beskyldt mig for, og de har heller ikke andre regler om sagen. Så selvom jeg lavede en form for fordelsspil i kasinoet (hvilket jeg ikke var!), har de ikke engang specifikke regler imod det. De opstiller simpelthen beskyldninger og anvender ikke-relaterede regler for at undgå at skulle betale lovlige vindere.
I signed up a week ago to bet sports at Sportbet.one. Yesterday I transferred USDT $1000 to their live dealer casino. Within 45 minutes of playing live dealer blackjack I ran that up to $14,705. When I tried to transfer my casino balance back to the sportsbook it went under review for 12 hours, after which time they transferred just my original $1000 back to the sportsbook and removed all my winnings, sending me the following explanation by email:
Your casino session #55516 was canceled after the results of the provider's investigation.
The official response of the provider:
Checked the player's gameplay for signs of fraudulent activity. The investigation found that the user benefits by using shuffle tracking and card counting techniques.
You also violated several basic rules of our platform:
The betting company reserves the right to revoke the concluded betting agreement (including the bets placed before and after the beginning of the event), refuse to fulfill its obligations under this agreement (including paying out the winnings), or refuse to return any placed bets , if:
- bets are made by a group of clients acting in a coalition to bypass the restrictions established by the betting company;
- the client is suspected of using any software that automates the process of setting bets;
- the client uses the game account to play in arbitration situations;
The full text of the rules can be found here: https://sportbet.one/rules.
This time we are refunding your deposit and strongly recommend you to follow our platform rules.
Firstly, I did not engage in any "shuffle tracking" or "counting techniques". Here is the debit/credit history of each hand and a video where I go through the entire 89 hand history of the session so there can be complete transparency of the hands I played and the bet amounts I made.
https://i.postimg.cc/g2vXGJrJ/sportbetone-history.jpg
https://streamable.com/3l4kpq
I don’t know much about advantage blackjack play but I’ve seen enough movies to know that it’s a long grind and you would dramatically change your bet size based on the count of the deck. You can see by my debit/credit history that my session was short (45 minute), and I started off betting $500/hand and varied it by no more than $100-$200 per hand up to a maximum of $1000 a hand. Also you can see by my hand history that I won 13 of my first 17 hands of the session which accounted for the bulk of my winnings, and the pattern I exhibit is betting slightly more after a run of consecutive losses and slightly less after a run of consecutive wins. There would have been a few card shuffle changes within this session but that was the consistent pattern I exhibited and my bet size did not materially change due to any other factors throughout my session.
Also out of the 89 blackjack hands I played I experienced a net loss in 46 of them and a net gain in just 43 of them. Where I did experience winnings were on side bets such as "perfect pair" and "rummy", which no advantage player would participate in. I placed roughly 20% of my blackjack stake on each and every hand on these side bets and just got lucky there.
So after they get this bogus explanation from the gaming supplier they cite several rules that I would have broken.
- bets are made by a group of clients acting in a coalition to bypass the restrictions established by the betting company;
- the client is suspected of using any software that automates the process of setting bets;
- the client uses the game account to play in arbitration situations;
All these rules: 1) syndicate play, 2) automated betting software, 3) arbitrage are all related to SPORTS BETTING. These have nothing to do with the casino play or what they are falsely accused me of, nor do they have any other rules on the matter. So even if I was doing some sort of advantage play in the casino, (which I wasn’t!), they don’t even have specific rules against it. They are simply making up accusations then applying unrelated rules to avoid having to pay out legitimate winners.
Automatisk oversættelse: