Kære alle,
Tak for din tålmodighed. Jeg bekræfter, at sagen blev drøftet med Nick, hvorefter den var genstand for vores interne drøftelse.
For det første vil jeg gerne påpege, at på det tidspunkt, Schnoffyg deltog og vandt fra free roll-turneringerne, blev reglen om, at spillere formodes at placere en indbetaling mellem hver respektive turneringsdeltagelse, kun nævnt i en af de to tilfælde, hvor reglerne for free roll-turneringerne blev nævnt i vilkårene og betingelserne (og/eller kun inkluderet i desktopversionen af hjemmesiden, som antaget i begyndelsen). I dette tilfælde var dette tilsyneladende årsagen til, at spilleren ikke blev informeret ordentligt om reglerne for de turneringer, han deltog i.
Hos Casino.Guru ser vi gerne, at betingelser som den, der er tale om her, håndhæves på softwareniveau, så spillere ikke kan bryde vilkårene og betingelserne ved et uheld.
I betragtning af, at reglen var (men også på en måde ikke blev) nævnt i vilkårene og betingelserne, så i betragtning af, at reglen ikke på nogen måde håndhæves af software, og på den anden side i betragtning af, at i den periode schoffyg deltog i turneringerne, havde han ingen indskud, det faktum, at de gevinster, hvorfra han efterfølgende akkumulerede det omstridte beløb, ikke krævede, at han købte Add-ons og Re-buys, selvom han gjorde det i tidligere, teknisk takket være at kunne bruge gevinsterne fra tidligere turneringer til at købe Add-ons og Re-buys i følgende turneringer (ergo har hun på en måde opnået en fordel), mener vi, at at indgå et kompromis her er den mest retfærdige vej at gå. Vores forslag er, at schnoffyg og Sunrise Slots Casino mødes halvvejs i dette tilfælde.
Dear all,
Thank you for your patience. I confirm that the matter was discussed with Nick, after which it was subject to our internal discussion.
Firstly, I would like to point out the fact that at the time schnoffyg was participating and winning from the free roll tournaments, the rule saying that players are supposed to place a deposit in between each respective tournament entry was only mentioned in one of the two instances where the rules of the free roll tournaments were mentioned in the Terms and Conditions (and/or only included in the desktop version of the website, as assumed at the beginning). In this case, this apparently was the reason why the player was not informed properly about the rules of the tournaments he was participating in.
At Casino.Guru, we would like to see conditions such as the one in question here being enforced at software level so that players can’t break the Terms and Conditions by accident.
Now, considering that the rule was (but also in a way wasn’t) mentioned in the Terms and Conditions, then considering the fact that the rule is not in any way enforced by software, and on the other hand, considering the fact that during the period schoffyg participated in the tournaments, he had not placed any deposits, the fact that the winnings from which he subsequently accumulated the disputed amount, did not require him to buy Add-ons and Re-buys, even though he did in the previous ones, technically thanks to being able to use just the winnings from previous tournaments to buy Add-ons and Re-buys in following tournaments (ergo she has, in a way, gained an advantage), we believe that making a compromise here is the fairest way to go. Our suggestion is for schnoffyg and Sunrise Slots Casino to meet halfway in this case.
Automatisk oversættelse: