Kristina,
Jeg håber, at denne besked finder dig godt. Jeg vil gerne udtrykke min oprigtige påskønnelse for enhver hjælp, du kan yde, især i betragtning af problemets kompleksitet. Selvom jeg forstår, at din ekspertise muligvis ikke er direkte relateret til det juridiske område, mener jeg, at det er en bekymring for alle at sikre retfærdighed og retfærdighed.
Som ingeniør er logik og klarhed grundlæggende for min tilgang til problemløsning. Før jeg accepterede bonussen, gennemgik jeg omhyggeligt vilkårene og betingelserne fra Twin. Mens udtryk som indskudsbeløb (konceptkontosaldo) forblev tvetydige.
Twins punkt 3, "Deltagelse i kampagnen og bonussvindel," fangede især min opmærksomhed. Det tyder på, at tilbagetrækning fra deltagelse erstatter koncept A og resulterer i tab af koncept Y. Den nøjagtige karakter af koncept A er dog stadig uklar. Gennem logisk deduktion spekulerede jeg i, at Twin kan have sat lighedstegn mellem koncept Z og koncept A, omend med en anden terminologi. Hvis faktisk A=Z, så vil en tilbagetrækning af Z indebære at erstatte den og miste Y, hvilket i sidste ende vender tilbage til det indskudte beløb (X), som burde være sikkert at hæve.
På trods af mine bestræbelser på at afklare disse uoverensstemmelser i Twins vilkår og betingelser:
"1. I punkt 1.4 henvises der første gang til begrebet indskudt beløb og bonusbeløb, forstærket senere i punkt 1.5. I slutningen af punkt 1 præsenteres dog eksempler baseret på indskudte beløb, hvor et "beløb" er nævnt bonuskonto", defineret som summen af det beløb, der kommer fra bonussen og det indsatte beløb.
2. I punkt 1.5 er der en klar skelnen mellem bonusbeløbet og det indbetalte beløb, hvilket indikerer en forskel mellem de to. Denne skelnen er dog ikke længere tydelig på senere tidspunkter, hvilket kan forvirre brugeren.
3. I punkt 2.2 skelnes der igen mellem bonusbeløbet og det indsatte beløb med eksempler, der tydeligt adskiller dem.
4. I punkt 2.6 introduceres begrebet bonuskontosaldo og hovedkontosaldo, noget nyt, der tidligere kun blev nævnt beløbsmæssigt og ikke saldi. Det er dog ikke klart, om bonuskontoens saldo er summen af bonusbeløbet og det indskudte beløb.
5. I punkt 2.7 står der, at "Bonuspenge bruges indtil bonuskontoen falder til under €0,20". Dette tyder på, at bonuspenge refererer til de penge, der genereres af selve bonussen, ikke konceptet med bonuskontoens saldo. Det ville måske være mere hensigtsmæssigt at bruge udtrykket "bonuskontosaldo" i denne sammenhæng i betragtning af uklarheden i vilkårene.
6. I punkt 3.1 er det forklaret, at når du trækker dig fra deltagelse i kampagnen, vil bonuskontoens saldo blive nulstillet, hvilket resulterer i tab af ethvert modtaget bonusbeløb.
7. Ovenstående i punkt 3.1 er i modstrid med de tidligere indførte begreber, ved at anvende begrebet værdien af den modtagne bonus og dermed skelne mellem bonusbeløbet og indbetalingen."
En opløsning forbliver uhåndgribelig. Din vejledning og støtte til at navigere i denne sag ville blive meget værdsat.
Ved at hjælpe mig i denne sag vil du ikke kun hjælpe en person i nød, men også stå imod uretfærdighed og forseelse. Mit mål handler ikke kun om den monetære værdi, der er involveret, selvom den repræsenterer en betydelig del af mindstelønnen i Portugal. Det handler om at opretholde principper om retfærdighed og ansvarlighed, principper, der stemmer overens med din organisations mission.
Som Casino Guru med rette siger, er det vigtigt at gribe ind, når spillere bliver behandlet uretfærdigt. Ved at kaste lys over tilfælde af manglende overholdelse og uærlighed bidrager vi til en mere retfærdig og mere gennemsigtig spilindustri.
Jeg takker dig oprigtigt for at overveje min anmodning og håber stadig på en positiv løsning.
Varme hilsner
Kristina,
I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my sincere appreciation for any assistance you can provide, especially given the complexity of the issue. While I understand your expertise may not directly relate to the legal realm, I believe that ensuring justice and fairness is a concern for everyone.
As an engineer, logic and clarity are fundamental to my approach to problem-solving. Before accepting the bonus, I carefully reviewed the terms and conditions provided by Twin. While terms such as Deposited Amount (Concept Account Balance) remained ambiguous.
Twin's point 3, "Participation in the campaign and bonus fraud," particularly caught my attention. It suggests that withdrawing from participation replaces Concept A and results in the loss of Concept Y. However, the exact nature of Concept A remains unclear. Through logical deduction, I speculated that Twin may have equated Concept Z with Concept A, albeit using different terminology. If indeed A=Z, then withdrawing Z would imply replacing it and losing Y, ultimately returning to the deposited amount (X), which should be safe to withdraw.
Despite my efforts to clarify these discrepancies within Twin's terms and conditions:
"1. In point 1.4, the first reference is made to the concept of deposited amount and bonus amount, reinforced later in point 1.5. However, at the end of point 1, examples are presented based on deposited amounts, where an "amount" is mentioned bonus account", defined as the sum of the amount coming from the bonus and the amount deposited.
2. In point 1.5, there is a clear distinction between the bonus amount and the deposited amount, indicating a difference between the two. However, this distinction is no longer evident at later points, which can confuse the user.
3. In point 2.2, a distinction is made again between the bonus amount and the deposited amount, with examples that clearly differentiate them.
4. In point 2.6, the concept of bonus account balance and main account balance is introduced, something new that was previously only mentioned in terms of amounts and not balances. However, it is not clear whether the bonus account balance is the sum of the bonus amount and the deposited amount.
5. In point 2.7, it is stated that "Bonus money is used until the bonus account drops below €0.20". This suggests that bonus money refers to the money generated by the bonus itself, not the concept of the bonus account balance. It would perhaps be more appropriate to use the term "bonus account balance" in this context, given the lack of clarity in the terms.
6. In point 3.1, it is explained that when withdrawing from participation in the campaign, the bonus account balance will be reset, resulting in the loss of any bonus amount received.
7. The above in point 3.1 contradicts the concepts previously introduced, by using the concept of the value of the bonus received, and thus distinguishing between the amount of the bonus and the deposit."
A resolution remains elusive. Your guidance and support in navigating this matter would be greatly appreciated.
By assisting me in this matter, you'll not only be aiding an individual in need but also standing against injustice and misconduct. My aim isn't merely about the monetary value involved, although it does represent a significant portion of the minimum wage in Portugal. It's about upholding principles of fairness and accountability, principles that resonate with your organization's mission.
As Casino Guru rightfully states, intervening when players are treated unfairly is essential. By shedding light on instances of non-compliance and dishonesty, we contribute to a fairer and more transparent gaming industry.
I sincerely thank you for considering my request and remain hopeful for a positive resolution.
Warm regards
Kristina,
I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my sincere appreciation for any assistance you can provide, especially given the complexity of the issue. While I understand your expertise may not directly relate to the legal realm, I believe that ensuring justice and fairness is a concern for everyone.
As an engineer, logic and clarity are fundamental to my approach to problem-solving. Before accepting the bonus, I carefully reviewed the terms and conditions provided by Twin. While terms such as Deposited Amount (Concept X), Bonus Amount (Concept Y), and Bonus Account Amount (Concept Z, where Z=X+Y) were clear, definitions of Concept A (Bonus Account Balance) and Concept B (Main Account Balance) remained ambiguous.
Twin's point 3, "Participation in the campaign and bonus fraud," particularly caught my attention. It suggests that withdrawing from participation replaces Concept A and results in the loss of Concept Y. However, the exact nature of Concept A remains unclear. Through logical deduction, I speculated that Twin may have equated Concept Z with Concept A, albeit using different terminology. If indeed A=Z, then withdrawing Z would imply replacing it and losing Y, ultimately returning to the deposited amount (X), which should be safe to withdraw.
Despite my efforts to clarify these discrepancies within Twin's terms and conditions:
"1. No ponto 1.4, é feita a primeira referência ao conceito montante depositado e montante do bónus, reforçada posteriormente no ponto 1.5. No entanto, no final do ponto 1, são apresentados exemplos baseados nos montantes depositados, onde é mencionado um "montante da conta bónus", definido como a soma do montante proveniente do bónus e do montante depositado.
2. No ponto 1.5, há uma clara distinção entre o montante do bónus e o montante depositado, indicando uma diferença entre os dois. No entanto, essa distinção deixa de ser evidente em pontos posteriores, o que pode confundir o utilizador.
3. No ponto 2.2, é feita novamente uma distinção entre o montante do bónus e o montante depositado, com exemplos que os diferenciam claramente.
4. No ponto 2.6, é introduzido o conceito de saldo da conta bónus e saldo da conta principal, algo novo que antes só era mencionado em termos de montantes e não de saldos. No entanto, não fica claro se o saldo da conta bónus é a soma do montante proveniente do bónus e do montante depositado.
5. No ponto 2.7, é declarado que "o dinheiro do Bónus é utilizado até que a conta de bónus desça abaixo de 0.20€". Isto sugere que o dinheiro do bónus se refere ao dinheiro gerado pelo próprio bónus, não ao conceito de saldo da conta bónus. Talvez fosse mais apropriado utilizar o termo "saldo da conta bónus" neste contexto, dada a falta de clareza nos termos.
6. No ponto 3.1, é explicado que ao desistir da participação na campanha, ocorre a reposição do saldo da conta de bónus, resultando na perda de qualquer valor de bónus recebido.
7. O exposto no ponto 3.1 contradiz os conceitos previamente introduzidos, ao utilizar o conceito do valor do bónus recebido, e desta forma distinguir entre o montante do bónus e do depósito."
A resolution remains elusive. Your guidance and support in navigating this matter would be greatly appreciated.
By assisting me in this matter, you'll not only be aiding an individual in need but also standing against injustice and misconduct. My aim isn't merely about the monetary value involved, although it does represent a significant portion of the minimum wage in Portugal. It's about upholding principles of fairness and accountability, principles that resonate with your organization's mission.
As Casino Guru rightfully states, intervening when players are treated unfairly is essential. By shedding light on instances of non-compliance and dishonesty, we contribute to a fairer and more transparent gaming industry.
I sincerely thank you for considering my request and remain hopeful for a positive resolution.
Warm regards
Automatisk oversættelse:
Deaktiver din AdBlock