Er den grund ikke virkelig forfærdelig?
Ja, jeg kan godt lide blackjack, og jeg spiller det meget, men hvad mener du med misbrug?
Jeg valgte at spille blackjack med denne udbyder på grund af følgende årsager.
Indsatsgrænsen er høj. Andre spil har en lavere grænse, f.eks. $100.
Jeg satser $500 en gang på blackjack, hvilket begrænser antallet af blackjack-udbydere.
Spillets hastighed er høj. Jeg kan ikke lide live blackjack på grund af dets langsomme tempo. Jeg foretrækker at spille videospil, der er tempofyldt.
Udbyderen er velkendt og pålidelig i Japan.
Af ovenstående grunde spillede jeg kun blackjack, fordi det var det eneste spil, jeg kunne finde, der havde høje indsatser og den hurtigste hastighed.
Jeg tror ikke, det er muligt at misbruge den berømte korttælling på grund af videospillets karakter.
Jeg spillede lige et spil, som du havde forberedt.
Jeg har også spillet andre spil, og jeg tror, at hovedårsagerne til stigningen i min saldo denne gang var $600 slot jackpotten for gratis spins, $20.000 jackpotten på et $200 Crazy Time bet og $60.000 jackpotten jeg vandt på en enkelt $100 Plinkos høje risiko.
Jeg kan kun tro, at kasinoet forsøger at konfiskere min store gevinst denne gang af en eller anden passende grund.
Gambling handler om at nyde heldet. Det er for meget at konfiskere, bare fordi en spiller tilfældigvis vandt ved volatilitet.
Selvom der er et eller andet problem med blackjack, som casinoet hævder, har spillere ingen mulighed for at kende programmeringen af de spil, der tilbydes af udbyderen. De skal snarere spille med troen på, at alle spil, uanset om de er live, slots eller video, altid er fair. Jeg tror, det er det, kasinoer er til for, at tro på det og nyde at vinde med held.
Jeg synes, det er forkert at give spilleren skylden for udbyderens fejl, bare fordi han/hun tror på og spiller de spil, der leveres af BCgame-siden.
Du nævnte misbrug af bonusserne, er det misbrug af, at du fik mange bonusser? BCgames VIP-system er, at hvis du satser meget, får du en bonus i forhold til det. Hvordan kan du få ekstra bonusser? Det ville være umuligt.
Hvis det er teorien, ville højere VIP'er end mig blive behandlet på samme måde?
Min påstand er, at jeg bare spillede det spil, jeg kunne lide, i tillid til, at det var fair.
Hvis der var en fejl i spillet, er det udbyderens eller casinoets ansvar.
Hvis der er en maskine, der falder ind under grundene til, at jeg valgte ovenstående i første omgang, ville jeg spille andre blackjack-spil. Det var alt, jeg kunne finde i min søgning.
Hvis du giver spilleren skylden for det problematiske spil, så bliver alt, hvad du troede var retfærdigt, ødelagt.
Der bør ikke være fejl i et spil, der tilbydes gennem et kontrolbureau.
Jeg tror, at vi udgiver spil, fordi de er blevet anmeldt og anset for retfærdige.
Hvis der var et problem med noget, der var blevet gennemgået, foretog du nogle ændringer i det efter gennemgangen og frigav det?
Casinoet sender bonusserne i henhold til reglerne i BCgames VIP-system, så der er ingen måde, at spillere kan gøre krav på dem ulovligt.
Saldostigningen denne gang skyldtes for det meste jackpots vundet i andre spil end blackjack. Jeg spillede ikke kun blackjack.
Kære Casino Guru.
Tager jeg fejl i min påstand?
Oversat med DeepL.com (gratis version) 
Isn't that reason indeed terrible?
Yes, I like blackjack and I play it a lot, but what do you mean by abuse?
I chose to play blackjack with this provider because of the following reasons.
The betting limit is high. Other games have a lower limit, like $100.
I bet $500 a time on blackjack, which limits the number of blackjack providers.
The speed of the game is fast. I don't like live blackjack because of its slow pace. I prefer to play video games that are fast-paced.
The provider is well-known and reliable in Japan.
For the above reasons, I only played blackjack because it was the only game I could find that had high stakes and the fastest speed.
I don't think it is possible to abuse the famous card counting due to the nature of the video game.
I was just playing a game that you had prepared.
I've been playing other games as well, and I think the main reasons for the increase in my balance this time were the $600 slot jackpot for free spins, the $20,000 jackpot on a $200 Crazy Time bet, and the $60,000 jackpot I won on a single $100 Plinko's high risk.
I can only think that the casino is trying to confiscate my big win this time for some appropriate reason.
Gambling is about enjoying luck. It is too much to confiscate just because a player happened to win by volatility.
Even if there is some problem with blackjack, as the casino claims, players have no way of knowing the programming of the games offered by the provider. Rather, they have to play with the belief that all games, whether live, slots, or video, are always fair. I believe that's what casinos are for, to believe that and enjoy winning by luck.
I think it is wrong to blame the player for the provider's mistakes just because he/she believes and plays the games provided by the BCgame side.
You mentioned abusing the bonuses, is it abusing the fact that you got a lot of bonuses? BCgame's VIP system is that if you bet a lot, you get a bonus in proportion to that. How can you claim extra bonuses? It would be impossible.
If that's the theory, would higher VIPs than me be treated in the same way?
My claim is that I was just playing the game I liked, trusting that it was fair.
If there was some mistake in the game, it is the provider's or casino's responsibility.
If there is a machine that falls under the reasons I chose the above in the first place, I would play other blackjack games. That's all I could find in my search.
If you blame the player for the problematic game, then everything you believed to be fair is destroyed.
There should be no mistakes in a game that is offered through a vetting agency.
I believe that we are releasing games because they have been reviewed and deemed fair.
If there was a problem with something that had been reviewed, did you make any changes to it after the review and release it?
The casino sends the bonuses according to the rules of BCgame's VIP system, so there is no way that players can claim them illegally.
The balance increase this time was mostly due to jackpots won in games other than blackjack. I didn't only play blackjack.
Dear Casino Guru.
Am I wrong in my assertion?
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Automatisk oversættelse:
