Tak for dit svar.
Lad mig opsummere vores tilgang, når vi overvejer en sag om tilbagebetaling af indskud på grund af mislykket selvudelukkelse:
Vi mener, at casinoet bør forhindre spillere, der informerer casinoet om spilleproblemer eller afhængighed, i at spille videre ved at blokere deres konto inden for rimelig tid. Hvis en sådan beskyttelse mislykkes, bør kasinoet returnere spillerens indskud.
Men for at vi kan fortsætte med at anmode om penge fra kasinoet, har vi brug for bevis for, at kasinoet blev informeret om dit spilproblem. Forstå venligst, at kasinoet ikke er forpligtet til at fortælle os andet end det, de allerede har fortalt dig. Hvis der ikke er noget bevis, har vi ingen chance for at konfrontere casinoet.
Derfor vil jeg gerne spørge dig, om der er noget bevis for, at du informerede casinoet om dit spilproblem, før din første selvudelukkelse blev aktiveret, eller før din casinokonto blev genåbnet.
Jeg beklager ulejligheden.
Thanks for your reply.
Please let me sum up our approach when we consider a case for a refund of deposits due to failed self-exclusion:
We believe the casino should prevent players who inform the casino about gambling problems or addiction from playing further by blocking their account in a reasonable time. If such protection fails the casino should return the player's deposits.
However, for us to proceed with requesting the funds from the casino, we need proof the casino was informed about your gambling issue. Please understand the casino is not obligated to tell us anything else other than what they already told you. If there is no proof, we stand no chance of confronting the casino.
That is why I would like to ask you if there is any proof you informed the casino about your gambling problem before your first self-exclusion was activated or before your casino account was reopened.
I apologize for the inconvenience.
Automatisk oversættelse: