Men hvis den information, du har modtaget fra casinoet, og du siger, at den ikke falder ind under diskussionsemnet, ville du ikke tale om det, for det betyder ikke noget. Jeg håber ikke, at dette er en bestikkelse fra FCMUN. For at forsvare bookmakerens position for penge. Jeg håber, at informationen fra bookmakeren vil være lige så åben som vores dialog, bookmakeren, regulatoren og mig.
Du har ikke spillet i casinoets casinosektion siden juli, men kun i sportsbook
-Jeg spillede i kasinoet, og det er en kendsgerning, og jeg skal ikke huske, hvor meget tid jeg tilbragte der. Det vigtigste er, at jeg spillede, på hvilke datoer, kan jeg ikke huske
Du formåede at hæve et betydeligt beløb fra casinoet, tidligere og/eller også fra sportsbook
-Jeg vil aldrig sige, at jeg har hævet noget væsentligt beløb, for det er deres opgave at udbetale gevinster. Min konto før spærringen var negativ, hvilket betyder, at jeg tabte meget. Og hvis jeg tabte meget, så lavede jeg indskud. Jeg kan ikke se nogen mening i at overveje spørgsmålet om, hvorvidt jeg har udledt meget eller lidt. Det vigtigste er, at jeg lavede store indskud der.
Dine omstridte gevinster blev kun akkumuleret i sportsbook (i august og september)
-I dette tilfælde, ja, men jeg spillede også i kasinoet. Og spørgsmålet er uklart, hvis jeg havde vundet i kasinoet, ville de have gjort det samme. Det er bare det, at casinosystemet håndteres af andre udbydere med henblik på spillerens tab, ja, som et system, der bør tage penge. Og fcmoon beskæftiger sig specifikt med sport, da de giver spillere adgang til at bruge sammen med casinoet. Faktisk bør en bookmaker, der bruger både sport og kasino, holdes lige ansvarlig. Her ser vi, at der er tale om svigagtige handlinger. Forestil dig, vi taler ikke om 10-50 dollars. Vi taler om store summer, bookmakeren tog dem i lommen, og ønsker nu ikke at returnere dem på grund af overtrædelsen af reglerne. Bemærk venligst, at jeg spillede med dem uden problemer, mens min konto var i minus, dvs. mens jeg lagde mine penge i deres lomme. Så snart spillet i andre retninger begyndte, fløj blokkene straks, da spilleren skal betale for gevinster. Og jeg mener derfor, at hvis bookmakeren ikke er i stand til at betale, så giver det ingen mening for ham at arbejde. Hvis han besluttede at bedrage mig, eller at snyde mig. Jeg skal betale for det, i mængden af den fulde tilbagetrækning af midler og en ærlig anmeldelse af hans bookmakeraktiviteter. Så alle, der ville have et ønske om at spille, vidste, at dette casino ikke udfører ærlige aktiviteter, med andre ord en svindler.
But if the information you received from the casino, and you say that it does not fall under the topic of discussion, you would not talk about it, because it does not matter. I hope this is not a bribe from the FCMUN. In order to defend the bookmaker's position for money. I hope that the information received from the bookmaker will be as open as our dialogue, the bookmaker, the regulator, and me.
You have not played in the casino's casino section since July but only in sportsbook
-I played in the casino, and that's a fact, and I don't have to remember how much time I spent there. The main thing is that I played, on what dates, I don't remember
You managed to withdraw a significant amount from the casino, in the past and/or also from sportsbook
-I will never say that I withdrew any significant amount, because paying out winnings is their job. My account before the blocking was negative, which means that I lost a lot. And if I lost a lot, then I made deposits. I don’t see any point in considering the question of whether I deduced a lot or a little. The main thing is that I made large deposits there.
Your disputed winnings were accumulated only in the sportsbook (in August and September)
-In this case, yes, but I also played in the casino. And the question is moot, if I had won in the casino, they would have done the same. It's just that the casino system is handled by other providers aimed at the player's loss, well, as a system that should take funds. And fcmoon specifically deals with sports, since they give players access to use together with the casino. In fact, a bookmaker who uses both sports and casino should be held equally responsible. Here we see that these are fraudulent actions. Just imagine, we are not talking about 10-50 dollars. We are talking about large sums, the bookmaker took them in his pocket, and now does not want to return them, due to the violation of the rules. Please note, I played with them without problems while my account was in the minus, that is, while I put my funds in their pocket. As soon as the game in other directions began, the blocks immediately flew, since the player needs to pay for winnings. And I therefore believe that if the bookmaker is not able to pay, then it makes no sense for him to work. If he decided to deceive me, or to cheat me. I must pay for it, in the amount of the full withdrawal of funds, and an honest review of his bookmaker activities. So that everyone who would have a desire to play, knew that this casino does not conduct honest activities, in other words, a fraudster.
Automatisk oversættelse:
