Se mailudvekslingen.
Årsagen til dette er, at casinorepræsentanten undlod at tjekke spilhistorikken og løj om ikke at opfylde udbetalingskravene.
Jeg bad den ansvarlige person om at tjekke min spilhistorik ordentligt, men han nægtede at gøre det.
Jeg har selv undersøgt spilhistorien og lavet et skærmbillede, der viser, at den ansvarlige tager fejl.
Dette er dog et arbejde, der burde være udført af en casinorepræsentant.
Derfor sagde jeg til ham, at hvis jeg skulle udføre det arbejde, som du skulle have løn for at udføre for dig, ville jeg selvfølgelig få løn for det.
Den ansvarlige accepterede og anmodede om skærmbilleder inklusive spilhistorik.
På dette tidspunkt er en kontrakt juridisk dannet.
Dette skyldes, at en mundtlig eller skriftlig kontrakt også er en respektabel kontrakt.
Jeg behøvede ikke at indsende et separat skærmbillede, jeg skulle bare rapportere casinoet til licensen, hvis de blev ved med at springe arbejdet over og nægtede at foretage udbetalinger.
See the email exchange.
The reason for this is that the casino representative failed to check the game history and lied about not meeting the withdrawal requirements.
I told the person in charge to properly check my game history, but he kept refusing to do so.
I have researched the game history myself and created a screenshot showing that the person in charge is wrong.
However, this is a job that should have been done by a casino representative.
Therefore, I told him that if I were to do the work that you should be paid to do for you, I would obviously get paid for it.
The person in charge agreed and requested screenshots including game history.
At this point, a contract is legally formed.
This is because a verbal or written contract is also a respectable contract.
I did not have to submit a separate screenshot, I just had to report the casino to the license if they kept skipping work and refusing to make withdrawals.
Redigeret
Automatisk oversættelse: