"Ikke sikker på, hvordan det hænger sammen, men det er det måske - jeg vil ikke sige, at det er i nogens magt at sende hver spiller bonustilbud i overensstemmelse med spillerens nuværende bonushistorik for eksempel."
Vi lever i en så teknologisk avanceret verden, at det burde være en standardfunktion for systemer for at forhindre brugere i at "misbruge" dem, hvad end det måtte betyde. Hvis brugere opfordres til at samle point i et loyalitetsprogram, som giver dem mulighed for at købe gratis spins eller bonuspenge, er det ikke deres skyld at deltage; det er formålet med loyalitetssystemet, ikke? Et grelt eksempel på dette systems fejl er en mission, der kræver, at spillere samler, hvis jeg husker rigtigt, 30.000 point på 5 dage. At akkumulere så mange point gør det muligt for dem at købe 3 til 5 sæt med 100 gratis spins eller bonuskontantpakker.
"Hvorfor blev gevinsterne fra bonusser konfiskeret?"
I henhold til Betplays' Regel 16, informerede de mig ikke; de nævnte kun, at Regel 16 var et af de overtrådte punkter. Jeg bad om en mere specifik del af teksten, men intet er blevet oplyst til mig
"Hvorfor skulle spilleren miste gevinsten inden for to uger?"
Hvis en spiller har penge på sin konto og ønsker at spille, ville de så foretage yderligere indbetalinger, hvis ingen penge nogensinde var blevet udbetalt før? Jeg tror, at de fleste brugere spiller dagligt, så det er næsten umuligt at hæve, hvis det tager op til 5 dage. Så de venter på, at brugerne annullerer udbetalinger, men hvis de ikke gør det, går de til trin "vi lukker konto på grund af bla bla bla".
"Hvorfor ville du blive ved med at annullere udbetalingerne?"
For at fortsætte med at spille uden at indbetale dine egne penge, se venligst mit svar ovenfor.
"Not sure how it is related, but perhaps it is - I would not say it is in anyone's power to send each player bonus offers in accordance with the player's current bonus history for example."
We live in such a technologically advanced world that it should be a standard feature for systems to prevent users from "abusing" them whatever that may mean. If users are encouraged to collect points in a loyalty program, which allows them to purchase free spins or bonus cash, it's not their fault for participating; that's the purpose of the loyalty system, right? A glaring example of this system's flaw is a mission requiring players to collect, if I recall correctly, 30,000 points in 5 days. Accumulating that many points enables them to buy 3 to 5 sets of 100 free spins or bonus cash bundles.
"Why were the winnings from bonuses confiscated?"
According to Betplays' Rule 16, they didn't inform me; they only mentioned that Rule 16 was one of the violated points. I asked for a more specific part of the text, but nothing has been disclosed to me.
"Why should the player lose the winnings within two weeks?"
If a player has funds in their account and wants to play, would they make additional deposits if no funds had ever been paid out before? I think that most users play daily, so withdrawing is almost impossible if it takes up to 5 days. So they are waiting for users to cancel withdrawals but if they dont do that they go to step "we close account due to bla bla bla".
"Why would you keep cancelling the withdrawals?"
To continue playing without depositing your own money, please refer to my reply above.
Automatisk oversættelse: