Hej Radka,
Jeg er uenig, da det er sandsynligt, at kasinoet med en Curacao-licens ikke må operere i det land, og kun kasinoer med en tjekkisk licens er tilladt
Hi Radka,
I disagree as it is likely that the casino with a Curacao license is not allowed to operate in that country and only casinos with a Czech license are allowed
På den anden side er virkeligheden, at spillere fra Tjekkiet kan spille på Curacao kasinoer. Pointen er, at i den faktiske verden er spillere dem, der besøger kasinoer uden for deres jurisdiktioner. Jeg taler om virkeligheden her, ikke om lovene. Fordi det hele viser, at spilleren stadig skal tage ansvaret for at indsamle information, før han beslutter sig for at registrere sig. For eksempel tror jeg, at de andre er enige om, at alle børn i Storbritannien kender den lokale regulator, UKGC, og de ved, at de ikke skal lege andre steder.
Spørgsmålet, som den anden spiller postede, handlede om noget andet, selvom jeg er enig i, at det hænger sammen. Min pointe var at forklare, at næsten alle operatører i øjeblikket opererer under en licens, der definerer reglerne og omfanget af selvudelukkelse. Desuden tilbyder stort set alle operatører en form for selvudelukkelse til deres aktører, hvis omfang i høj grad afhænger af lovkrav og individuelle operatørers beslutninger.
Således er Curacao kasinoet for eksempel ikke opmærksom på selvudelukkelse foretaget gennem nogen anden national regulator. Spilleren skal aldrig forvente det modsatte.
On the other hand, the reality is that players from the Czech Republic can play at Curacao casinos. The point is that in the actual world, players are the ones who visit casinos outside their jurisdictions. I'm talking about the reality here, not about the laws. Because this whole thing demonstrates that the player still has to take the responsibility to gather information before he decides to register. For example, I think the others will agree that every child in the UK knows the local regulator, the UKGC, and they know they are not supposed to play elsewhere.
The question the other player posted was about something else, though I agree it is connected. My point was to explain that currently, almost all operators operate under a license that defines the rules and scope of self-exclusion. Moreover, virtually all operators offer some sort of self-exclusion to their players, whose scope is highly dependent on regulatory requirements and decisions of individual operators.
Thus, for example, the Curacao casino is not aware of self-exclusion made through any other national regulator. The player should never expect the opposite.