Kære spiller,
"Jeg har vist dig, at kasinoet selv siger, at både streamere og almindelige spillere har de samme regler. Streamere er underholdningsspillere, som de kan og laver udbetalinger."
Ja, vilkårene er de samme, men hvad du stadig ikke forstår er, at de samme regler kan anvendes forskelligt baseret på konkrete situationer.
Casual spillere udsætter ikke bonusrunder, reklamerer ikke for deres sessioner og spiller ikke med en enorm mængde "penge". Det er i øvrigt meget almindelige streamers praksis.
Jeg vil sige, at hvis du ikke spiller som en almindelig spiller, skal du være klar til at blive anerkendt som en anden slags spiller, hvilket kan resultere i at overtræde de samme regler.
"Med hensyn til casinolicensen, du nævnte, har jeg anmodet om den direkte fra casinoet selv, og de giver den ikke."
Antilephone-licensen virker ikke sådan. Selvom supporten leverede validatorens URL, virker det ikke. (https://validator.antillephone.com/validate?domain=casinowebsite.com&seal_id=cf98db6c7173....)
Yderligere forklaring er her 👈
"Derudover er der ikke noget logo for licensen på deres side. Hvis du har licensnummeret, ville det være rart at nævne det."
Som forklaret fungerer valideringen anderledes.
"Jeg har bedt om at få min sag genåbnet i et stykke tid nu, og jeg opfordrer åbent Zetcasino til at tage stilling foran alle."
Helt ærligt har klageteamet meget travlt, men jeg er sikker på, at de vil vende tilbage til dig til sidst.
Med hensyn til kasinoet tvivler jeg på, at der vil blive fremlagt beviser offentligt. Det ville være meget usædvanligt, fordi det at forklare processen betyder, at andre kan drage fordel af denne viden, hvilket ville begrænse kasinoets evne til at opdage svigagtige aktiviteter. Lad os se, hvad der så sker.
Dear player,
"I have shown you that the casino itself states that both streamers and regular players have the same rules. Streamers are entertainment players as they can and do make withdrawals."
Yes, the terms are the very same, yet what you still fail to comprehend is that the very same rules may be applied differently based on concrete situations.
Casual players don't postpone bonus rounds, do not advertise their sessions, and do not play with a huge amount of "money." Those are, by the way, very common streamers' practices.
I'd say, if you don't play like an ordinary player, you must be ready to be recognized as a different kind of player, which may result in violating the very same rules.
"As for the casino license you mentioned, I have requested it directly from the casino itself, and they do not provide it."
The Antilephone license does not work like this. Even if the support provided the validator's URL, it won't work. (https://validator.antillephone.com/validate?domain=casinowebsite.com&seal_id=cf98db6c7173....)
Further explanation is here 👈
"Additionally, there is no logo of the license on their site. If you have the license number, it would be nice to mention it."
As explained the validation works differently.
"I have been asking for my case to be reopened for a while now, and I openly call on Zetcasino to take a stance in front of everyone."
Frankly, the Complaint Team is very busy, but I'm sure they will get back to you eventually.
As for the casino, I doubt any evidence will be publicly presented. That would be very unusual because explaining the process means others may take advantage of this knowledge, which would limit the casino's ability to detect fraudulent activities. Let's see what happens next.
Automatisk oversættelse: