Kære nikosthegreek,
Mange tak for din klage. Jeg er ked af at høre om dit problem.
Forstå venligst, at KYC er en meget vigtig og essentiel proces, hvor casinoet sørger for, at pengene sendes til den retmæssige ejer. Da de ikke har den luksus at være i stand til fysisk at se alle spillerne og kontrollere deres identifikation og dokumenter, er dette den eneste måde, hvorpå spillesteder er i stand til at gennemføre verifikationsprocedurerne. Ingen af de seriøse og licenserede casinoer tager KYC let, og det kan tage et par arbejdsdage at gennemføre denne grundige proces.
Forstår jeg korrekt, at verificering af transaktionshistorikken ser ud til at være den eneste hindring, der står mellem dig og en vellykket verifikation? Forklarede kasinoet, hvad der var galt med dette dokument, eller hvorfor det ikke blev godkendt?
Jeg håber, vi vil være i stand til at hjælpe dig med at løse dette problem så hurtigt som muligt. På forhånd tak for dit svar.
Med venlig hilsen,
Kristina
Dear nikosthegreek,
Thank you very much for submitting your complaint. I’m sorry to hear about your problem.
Please understand that KYC is a very important and essential process, during which the casino makes sure that the money is sent to the rightful owner. As they don't have the luxury of being able to physically see all of the players and check their identification and documents, this is the only way gambling establishments are able to complete the verification procedures. None of the serious and licensed casinos take KYC lightly and it might take a few working days to complete this thorough process.
Do I understand correctly that verifying the transaction history seems to be the only obstacle standing between you and successful verification? Did the casino explain what was wrong with this document or why it wasn't approved?
I hope we will be able to help you to resolve this issue as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your reply.
Best regards,
Kristina
Automatisk oversættelse: