Tak for dit svar og for muligheden for at afklare situationen yderligere.
Adressering af kasinoets forklaring:
Verifikation og anerkendelse af land: Kasinosystemet anerkendte efter sigende, at jeg var fra Thailand ved verificering den 02-07-2024. Dette rejser dog spørgsmålet: hvorfor tillod kasinoet mig at indbetale, aktivere bonusser og fortsætte med at spille, hvis mit bopælsland gjorde mig ikke berettiget til disse bonusser?
Hvis systemet kunne registrere min placering efter verificering, er det logisk at antage, at denne genkendelse skulle være sket umiddelbart efter registreringen. Der burde have været en øjeblikkelig blokering af min mulighed for at gøre krav på bonusser, hvis sådanne bonusser faktisk var begrænset for spillere fra Thailand.
Ingen aktivitet efter verifikation: Påstanden om, at der ikke fandt nogen aktivitet sted på kontoen efter bekræftelsesprocessen, er unøjagtig, da jeg havde trukket penge flere gange, hvilket indikerer, at kontoen stadig var aktiv og operationel. Desuden blev verifikationsprocessen iværksat af kasinoet, efter at jeg allerede havde engageret mig i bonusserne og spillet spil. Dette fremhæver yderligere en uoverensstemmelse i kasinoets håndhævelse af dets egne regler.
Indfangning og retfærdighed:
At tillade mig at gøre krav på og bruge en bonus, som kasinoet senere anså for ugyldig på grund af mit bopælsland – uden nogen advarsel eller begrænsning på tidspunktet for registrering eller indbetaling – udgør en indespærring. Denne praksis er meget uretfærdig og strider mod principperne om gennemsigtighed og god tro i spilindustrien.
Kasinoets manglende håndhævelse af disse begrænsninger rettidigt retfærdiggør ikke den efterfølgende konfiskation af mine gevinster. Ved at tillade, at bonussen blev krævet og brugt, gav casinoet i realiteten sin ret til senere at hævde, at jeg ikke var berettiget til den.
Forpligtelser og begrundelser:
Kasinoet er inden for sine rettigheder til at begrænse bonusser baseret på en spillers bopælsland. Det er dog også forpligtet til at sikre, at disse restriktioner kommunikeres tydeligt og håndhæves fra starten. Det faktum, at jeg var i stand til at spille og vinde, før der blev rejst problemer, indikerer, at systemets checks var utilstrækkelige, og at ansvaret ligger hos casinoet for at overholde sine egne vilkår.
I betragtning af de fremlagte beviser, er det klart, at Velobet Casino tillod mig at deltage i bonussen og kun tilbagekaldte mine gevinster post-factum, hvilket hverken er retfærdigt eller berettiget.
Anmodning om betaling:
Baseret på rækkefølgen af begivenheder og manglerne i kasinoets håndhævelse af dets egne vilkår, anmoder jeg respektfuldt om, at Velobet Casino respekterer de legitime gevinster, der er opnået, før der blev rejst noget problem. Jeg har opfyldt alle bonuskrav og overholdt reglerne, som de blev præsenteret for mig på det tidspunkt.
Jeg ser frem til en hurtig og retfærdig løsning på denne sag.
Thank you for your response and for the opportunity to clarify the situation further.
Addressing the Casino's Explanation:
Verification and Recognition of Country: The casino system reportedly recognized that I was from Thailand upon verification on 02-07-2024. However, this raises the question: why did the casino allow me to deposit, activate bonuses, and continue playing if my country of residence made me ineligible for these bonuses?
If the system could detect my location after verification, it is logical to assume that this recognition should have occurred immediately upon registration. There should have been an immediate block on my ability to claim bonuses if such bonuses were indeed restricted for players from Thailand.
No Activity Post-Verification: The claim that no activity occurred on the account after the verification process is inaccurate, as I had withdrawn funds multiple times, indicating that the account was still active and operational. Moreover, the verification process was initiated by the casino after I had already engaged with the bonuses and played games. This further highlights a discrepancy in the casino's enforcement of its own rules.
Entrapment and Fairness:
Allowing me to claim and use a bonus that the casino later deemed invalid due to my country of residence—without any warning or restriction at the point of registration or deposit—constitutes entrapment. This practice is highly unfair and goes against the principles of transparency and good faith in the gaming industry.
The casino's failure to enforce these restrictions in a timely manner does not justify the subsequent confiscation of my winnings. By allowing the bonus to be claimed and used, the casino effectively waived its right to later claim that I was ineligible for it.
Obligations and Justifications:
The casino is within its rights to restrict bonuses based on a player's country of residence. However, it is also obliged to ensure that these restrictions are clearly communicated and enforced from the outset. The fact that I was able to play and win before any issues were raised indicates that the system's checks were insufficient and that the responsibility lies with the casino to uphold its own terms.
Given the evidence presented, it is clear that Velobet Casino allowed me to engage with the bonus and only revoked my winnings post-factum, which is neither fair nor justified.
Request for Payment:
Based on the sequence of events and the shortcomings in the casino's enforcement of its own terms, I respectfully request that Velobet Casino honors the legitimate winnings accrued before any issue was raised. I have met all bonus requirements and adhered to the rules as they were presented to me at the time.
I look forward to a prompt and fair resolution to this matter.
Automatisk oversættelse: