Tak for dit svar, George. Bemærk venligst, at din Casino.guru-konto er blevet oprettet af dig, og jeg har ikke valgt navnet på din konto. Jeg adresserede dig med det navn, du indtastede:
Nu vil jeg gerne understrege, at hvis det er rigtigt, at din datter har oprettet en konto i dit navn, har hun overtrådt en af de vigtigste casinoregler - hver spiller skal indtaste korrekte og gyldige personlige oplysninger om sig selv. En anden regel, der er blevet overtrådt - hver spiller skal indbetale penge fra en betalingsmetode udstedt i deres eget navn.
Stil dig selv et simpelt spørgsmål - hvordan skulle casinoet vide, hvem der oprettede en konto, hvis hun brugte en andens personlige oplysninger?
For ikke at nævne, at hvis hun havde adgang til dit kort, kunne hun helt sikkert nemt finde en måde, hvordan hun kunne få adgang til dit ID og andre dokumenter og bekræfte casinokontoen (forresten, lagde du ikke mærke til, at der var et ret betydeligt beløb forlader din bankkonto?). Ideelt set mener vi selvfølgelig, at kasinoer skal udføre en verifikation, før den første indbetaling overhovedet blev foretaget, men medmindre nogen fra kasinoet stod bag hende, mens hun oprettede kontoen og spillede, havde kasinoet ingen mulighed for at vide, hvem der brugte den. Igen skal du forstå, at kasinoer ikke er ansvarlige for nogens børn.
Situationen ville være en smule anderledes, hvis et mindreårigt barn oprettede en konto i deres eget navn med den korrekte fødselsdato - jeg vil indrømme, at kasinoet ikke har de bedste spillerbeskyttelsesværktøjer, og vi ville helt sikkert konfrontere kasinoet .
Desuden, som jeg forklarede tidligere, hvis kontoen blev oprettet i dit navn og indbetalinger blev foretaget ved hjælp af betalingsmetoder udstedt i dit navn, ville det være umuligt at bevise, at kontoen faktisk blev brugt af en anden, og jeg er mere end sikker på, at du forstår dette.
Endelig, da du nægtede at levere de nødvendige dokumenter, kan vi ikke støtte dig yderligere i denne sag.
Efter at have indsamlet alle de nødvendige oplysninger, mener vi ikke, at du er berettiget til refusion, og vi er tvunget til at afvise denne klage som uberettiget. Ikke desto mindre, hvis du er uenig i vores beslutning, kan du prøve at kontakte den licensudstedende myndighed, men jeg tror ikke, deres mening ville være meget anderledes end vores.
Thank you for your reply, George. Please note that your Casino.guru account has been created by you and I didn't choose the name of your account. I addressed you by the name you entered:
Now, I would like to emphasize that if it is true that your daughter created an account in your name, she breached one of the main casino rules - each player must enter correct and valid personal details about themselves. Another rule that has been breached - each player must deposit funds from a payment method issued in their own name.
Ask yourself a simple question - how was the casino supposed to know who created an account if she used the personal details of someone else?
Not to mention that if she had access to your card, she sure could easily find a way how to access your ID and other documents and verify the casino account (by the way, didn't you notice that quite a significant amount of money was leaving your bank account?). Sure, ideally, we think casinos should perform a verification before the first deposit was even made, but unless someone from the casino stood behind her while creating the account and playing, the casino had no way of knowing who was using it. Again, you must understand that casinos are not responsible for anyone's children.
The situation would be a little bit different if an underaged child created an account in their own name using the correct date of birth - I would admit that the casino doesn't have the best player protection tools, and we would for sure confront the casino.
Furthermore, as I explained previously if the account was created in your name and deposits were made using payment methods issued in your name, it would be impossible to prove that the account was in fact used by someone else and I am more than sure you understand this.
Lastly, since you refused to provide the required documents, we cannot support you further in this case.
After gathering all the necessary information we don't think you are entitled to a refund, and we are forced to reject this complaint as unjustified. Nonetheless, if you disagree with our decision, you can try contacting the licensing authority, but I don't think their opinion would be much different from ours.
Automatisk oversættelse: