Hej kære Radka
Så hvad prøver du at forklare os? At de af casinoet selv fastsatte vilkår, som vi som spillere gik med til, med at det udbetaler på 1-3 dage, ikke bliver fulgt? Er det okay fra dit perspektiv og bør ikke påvirke vurderingen? Hvis kasinoet betaler, når det vil, uden at give dig en årsag til forsinkelsen, så du kan adressere det eller levere dokumenter, der kan hjælpe, tæller det så ikke med i vurderingen? Det er forkert, at verifikation ikke er medtaget i vurderingen!
Hvis et casino forsøger at skabe bureaukratiske forhindringer under verifikationsprocessen for at udnytte tiden og gøre dig frustreret nok til at stoppe med at anmode om dine penge, burde det så ikke være inkluderet i dets vurdering?
Hvorfor, når du allerede har sendt fire dokumenter (som de spurgte), der tydeligt angiver og bekræfter din bopælsadresse, beder de så om din bilregistrering, som vi alle ved har købsdatoen, og fortæller dig, at det skal være nyere? Hvad vil du have os til at gøre som spillere? Sælge vores bil og købe en ny bare for at have en nyere købstitel? For selv det var ikke nok for dem.
Jeg har indtryk af, at du tager fejl – dette er kun min personlige mening – og at hurtig verifikation og hurtige udbetalingsmuligheder er faktorer, der bidrager positivt til et casinos omdømme.
Da brugeranmeldelserne ikke er verificerede, tillad mig at være i tvivl om, hvad der bliver skrevet. Med hensyn til klagerne ved jeg, at folk skal sende dig informationer, og du ved, om nogen er registreret eller ej, og de har mere værdi.
Om det usædvanlige, som du sagde, hvis de fandt noget "usædvanligt", skal de informere spilleren om forsinkelsen om undersøgelsen, den har fundet sted.
Hi dear Radka
So what are you trying to explain to us? That the terms set by the casino itself, which we as players agreed to, stating that it pays out in 1-3 days, are not being followed? Is that okay from your perspective and shouldn't affect its rating? If the casino pays whenever it wants without providing you with a reason for the delay so that you can address it or provide documents that might help, does that also not count towards its rating? It's wrong that verification isn't factored into the rating!
If a casino tries to create bureaucratic obstacles during the verification process to take advantage of time and make you frustrated enough to stop requesting your money, shouldn't that be included in its rating?
Why, when you've already sent four documents (that tehy asked) that clearly state and confirm your residential address, do they then ask for your car registration, which we all know has the date of purchase, and tell you it needs to be more recent? What do you want us to do as players? Sell our car and buy a new one just to have a more recent purchase title? Because even that wasn't enough for them.
I have the impression that you're mistaken—this is just my personal opinion—and that quick verification and fast withdrawal options are factors that contribute positively to a casino's reputation.
Since the user reviews are not verified, allow me to have doubts about what is being written. As for the complaints, I know that people need to send you informations and you know whether someone is registered or not, and those hold more value.
About the unusual that you stated , if they found something "unusual" they must inform the player for the delay about investigation its taken place.