I dette casino spillede jeg normalt på slots.
Nogle af spilleautomaterne har særlige regler, såsom gratis spins for at samle et bestemt antal symboler.
Der er andre slots, hvor en del af gevinsterne samles og kan tjenes ved at spille nogle.
(f.eks. sød alkymi)
Hvis casinoet havde givet mig ordentlig varsel, kunne jeg have brugt min resterende saldo til at spille slots og få gratis spins og spille.
Så vil balancen ændre sig.
At vide på forhånd, at din konto bliver lukket, gør en stor forskel i praksis.
(Ville der ikke være hændelser, hvor en konto bliver suspenderet, mens en bonus bliver fordøjet, og selvom indløsning er realistisk, betragtes det ikke som en cache? Hvis vi blev informeret på forhånd, ville den slags problemer være elimineret, ville'' ikke det?)
Hvis jeg havde vidst det på forhånd, kunne jeg have fået min rakeback.
(Kasinoet havde et system, hvor rakeback-indløsningsraten steg, efterhånden som spillerens VIP-niveau steg, hvilket var en mekanisme til at tilbageholde rakeback-kvitteringer.)
Har jeg ret i at forstå, at rakeback ikke er spillerens penge?
Desuden spiller jeg ikke med bonuspenge.
Kasinoet havde et veldefineret sæt spil, som ikke kunne spilles med bonussen.
In this casino I usually played the slots.
Some of the slots have special rules, such as free spins for collecting a certain number of symbols.
There are other slots where a portion of the winnings are pooled and can be earned by playing some.
(e.g. Sweet Alchemy)
If the casino had given me proper advance notice, I could have used my remaining balance to play the slots and get free spins and play.
Then the balance will change.
Knowing in advance that your account will be closed makes a big difference in practice.
(Wouldn't there be incidents where an account is suspended while a bonus is being digested, and even if cashing is realistic, it is not considered a cache? If we were informed in advance, that kind of trouble would be eliminated, wouldn't it?)
If I had known in advance, I could have received my rakeback.
(The casino had a system where the rakeback redemption rate increased as the player's VIP level increased, which was a mechanism to withhold rakeback receipts.)
Am I correct in understanding that the rakeback is not the player's money?
Also, I am not playing with bonus money.
The casino had a well-defined set of games that could not be played with the bonus.
Redigeret
Automatisk oversættelse: