Så har jeg ret i at antage, at Softswiss påstår brud på T&C?
Hvis det er tilfældet, ser det ud til, at Antillephone (skal vi måske også kalde dem Softswiss?), med sin ikke-regerende, i virkeligheden tager parti for kasinoet ved at videresende til dig, hvilken dum regel, de påstår, at du har brudt (som også kunne være en max win regel).
Uanset hvad, når én virksomhed ejer platformen, operatører, kasinoer, udbydere, spil, servere, tilknyttede selskaber OG licensorganet... ender du i denne type situation.
DAMA/Direx/Hollycorn/N1 - BGaming/Booongo/Booming Games/3OAKS/Playson - Antillephone NV - Softswiss ---> Putin
PS Hvis jeg pludselig holder op med at være et aktivt medlem af denne side, vil du vide, at det er fordi jeg ved et uheld faldt ihjel fra øverste etage i et højhus - gennem et optøjer-glasforstærket vindue, kan jeg tilføje - mens beruset og forårsaget tumult.. alt sammen efter at have indtaget en cocktail af opiatbaserede smertestillende midler, arsen og cyanid.
So am I correct in assuming Softswiss is alleging breach of T&C?
If that's the case, it appears that Antillephone (should we maybe call them Softswiss, too?), with its non-ruling, is in effect taking the side of the casino by forwarding to you whatever stupid rule they allege that you've broken (which could also be a max win rule).
Either way, when one company owns the platform, operators, casinos, providers, games, servers, affiliates AND the licensing body.. you end up in this type of situation.
DAMA/Direx/Hollycorn/N1 - BGaming/Booongo/Booming Games/3OAKS/Playson - Antillephone NV - Softswiss ---> Putin
P.S. If I suddenly stop being an active member of this site, you'll know it's because I accidentally fell to my death from the top floor of a high-rise building - through a riot-glass-reinforced window, I might add - while drunk and causing a commotion.. all after consuming a cocktail of opiate-based painkillers, arsenic and cyanide.
Redigeret af forfatter 1 måned siden
Automatisk oversættelse: